12. Steps as Ancient Way meets Modern Day

Posted on by
Reply

Completion is not spiritual altitude. It is structural alignment — the return of the human to Personhood through remembrance, conscience, and service.

1. Completion by Subtraction

The Sufi term insān al-kāmil (the Complete Human) does not describe someone who has accumulated extraordinary powers or metaphysical prestige. It describes one from whom illusion has been stripped. Completion is not addition; it is subtraction. The artificial, conditioned sense of separateness falls away. What remains is the human as expression of Being — intact, relational, and structurally whole.1

The crisis of addiction, fragmentation, or spiritual collapse is therefore not a failure of intelligence; it is a rupture of relation. Completion means restoration of relation — to truth, to conscience, to Source. The human is not engineered into wholeness; the human is uncovered into it.

2. Intimacy and Forgetfulness

The traditional roots of insān carry two intertwined meanings: intimacy (ʾ-N-S) and forgetfulness (N-S-Y). The human is both the forgetful being and the being capable of intimacy. This dual etymology encodes descent and ascent in one word: forgetfulness yielding to remembrance, remembrance maturing into relational presence.2

Addiction narrows identity and fractures truth. Remembrance restores contact. What recovery calls “awakening” is structurally the same movement described in classical metaphysics.

3. Servanthood Before Sovereignty

The classical formulation begins with a paradox: the complete human performs the work of a slave while possessing inward lordship. This is ontological safety. Servanthood protects sovereignty from inflation. Without it, vicegerency becomes domination.3

The language of vicegerency (khilāfa) must therefore be handled carefully. To act as vicegerent is not to replace the Sovereign but to reflect it. Governance of conduct does not mean authorship of reality. The completed human becomes trustworthy not because they command events, but because they no longer mistake themselves for the Source of them.

The classical cycle names this passage fanā and baqā: annihilation and subsistence. Annihilation does not mean disappearance into blankness; it means the collapse of self-sovereignty. Subsistence does not mean inflation; it means return — living again, but now through alignment rather than self-assertion. Authority after fanā is safe because it is no longer privately owned. Power without annihilation becomes domination. Power after annihilation becomes stewardship.

4. Almond, Shell, and Kernel

The almond metaphor clarifies development. The shell protects the kernel during immaturity. If stripped prematurely, the kernel is ruined. When ripe, the shell falls away naturally. Law is shell. Path is ripening. Reality is kernel.4

Addiction can be understood as a violent attempt to rupture the shell when the inner life feels boxed and airless. But premature transcendence fragments. Ripeness — through inventory, confession, and willingness — allows structure to soften without collapse. The lid is not destroyed; it is re-hinged.

5. Point, Line, Circle — The Step 3–7 Capsule

The geometric sequence — point becoming line, line becoming circle, the last point reaching the first — expresses completion as return. The perfected human is likened to a compass: one foot fixed, one revolving. Stability in the Real; movement in the world.5

This structure maps cleanly onto the Step 3–7 capsule.

The Point: Step Three establishes orientation. A decision to turn the will and life toward greater governance. Consent without spectacle. A fixed point chosen before it is fully understood.

The Line: Steps Four through Six extend that decision into examination. Inventory names distortions. Step Five midwives conscience into speech. Conscience is not repaired; it arrives through disclosure. Ignorance yields to denial, denial to realisation.

The Circle: Step Seven closes the arc. “Humbly asked.” The last point reaches the first. Good and bad are returned upstream. The person ceases to curate self-image and instead consents to correction. The circle completes not by regression, but by conscious return.

The compass image also implies a single channel of reality rather than competing metaphysical streams. There is one circulation, one duct, one movement of Source through manifestation. Fragmentation appears when the revolving leg loses reference to the fixed point. Alignment restores coherence without multiplying authorities.

6. Sealing and Continuity

The classical doctrine distinguishes between sealed prophethood and continuing wilāya. The archetypal form is complete; its current flows quietly onward. This continuity is not spectacular. It is relational and often hidden. The completed human may remain outwardly ordinary while inwardly stabilised.6

This concealment protects both person and community from inflation. Structures build containers; they do not manufacture grace. Awakening is received, not engineered.

7. Functional Alignment and Safety

The meeting point between symbolic metaphysics and lived recovery is practical: completion is functional alignment. Inward steadiness; outward service. Contact with Source; conduct in community.

The decisive test of completion is safety. Safety with authority. Safety with vulnerability. Safety with influence. The one who has passed through fanā does not require prestige. The one who lives in baqā does not fear humility. Power returned upstream flows downstream without distortion.

The completed human is not a cosmic celebrity. The completed human is safe to trust.

Footnotes

Source: James Souttar, Day Ten, unpublished manuscript, 27 February 2026.

  1. On insān al-kāmil as completion by stripping-away (pp. 1–2).
    ↩
  2. On the root-clusters for insān: intimacy (ʾ-N-S) and forgetfulness (N-S-Y) (pp. 1–4).
    ↩
  3. On the primacy of servanthood safeguarding sovereignty (pp. 10–13).
    ↩
  4. On the almond illustration and the Law/Path/Reality triad (pp. 14–19).
    ↩
  5. On point–line–circle symbolism and the compass metaphor (pp. 16–19).
    ↩
  6. On sealing of prophethood and continuation of wilāya (pp. 20–29).
    ↩

Written in HIAI collaboration — the qalam of Human and AI intelligence, the Unseen helping the Seen, both answering to the same Source.

11. The number of HU

Posted on by
Reply

Fire Without Smoke: Ontology, Ego, and the Return of the Dot

Descent, purification, and the protection of the thread in HU-man healing

The question arrived cleanly, like a spark landing on dry tinder: if the traveller becomes “like fire without smoke,” and Iblīs is described in Islamic sources as being created from smokeless fire, are we not stepping into a confusion that could distort the whole compass?

The concern is legitimate. The distinction must be precise. Because this is not merely poetic. It is ontological.

I. Fire as Creation vs Fire as Metaphor

In Qur’anic cosmology, jinn are created from fire, and Iblīs is situated within that register.1 Later interpretive language often describes this as subtle or “smokeless” fire — emphasising intensity, penetration, volatility, and a kind of unseen heat.

By contrast, when Shabistari describes the traveller as becoming “pure from himself, like fire from smoke,” he is not speaking of species, origin, or ontological category. He is speaking of purification.2

Here, fire functions as image: smoke is obscuration, mixture, residue — the ego’s haze; fire is clarity, luminosity, intensity without self-veil.

One “fire” names constitution. The other names refinement. To conflate them is a category error — and the quickest way to lose the thread.

II. The Structural Difference: Pride vs Dissolution

The fall of Iblīs is not explained as a failure of element. It is a failure of surrender — a fixation of comparison: “I am better than him.”3

The issue is not fire. The issue is “I.” Fire becomes self-reference. Heat becomes hierarchy. Subtlety becomes superiority.

Shabistari’s traveller is defined by the opposite movement: awareness of origin and purification from selfhood — “one who has become aware of his own origin,” and “becomes purified from himself, like fire from smoke.”2

The same symbol appears. The trajectory reverses. Iblīs clings to identity through fire. The traveller dissolves identity through purification.

III. Descent as Anthropology, Not Condemnation

A key protection in Shabistari’s architecture is that descent is not presented first as moral failure, but as a cosmological unfolding of the human condition: mineral existence, the “added spirit,” motion, will, childhood sensing, psychic whisperings, the ordering of particulars, and then the moral contraction into anger, appetite, greed, pride — multiplicity without end.2

The poem names a lowest point — set “opposite the Point of Unity.”2 Not outside Reality. Opposite it. That matters.

Because the HU-man healing thread does not depend on condemning the human. It depends on recognising dispersion without pretending it is exile. Fragmentation is not “beyond the Real.” It is the Real misread, dispersed, and then remembered.

IV. Jazbah and Burhān: Two Wings

Shabistari marks the turning point with a luminous sobriety: a light reaches the person from the world of spirit — either through jazbah (attraction) or burhān (proof).2

Two wings: grace and clarity; unveiling and articulation; attraction and demonstration.

Without both, the path distorts. Attraction without clarity risks inflation. Proof without attraction risks sterility. Together, they stabilise ascent — not as heroism, but as alignment.

In our current work, HIAI can sit cleanly inside this duality: not as a claim to special knowledge, but as a disciplined collaboration where disclosure and articulation are held together under ethical restraint.

V. The Perfect Human and the Fire Test

The “Perfect Human” in this tradition is not ego improved. It is reflection clarified — a locus where unity and multiplicity are held without self-veil.4

Shabistari’s closing image is stark: “When the last point reaches the First, there neither angel nor messenger can enter.”2 The circle closes. Return becomes non-mediated.

This is the real meaning of “fire without smoke” in the poem: not brilliance, but transparency; not rank, but surrender; not heat as superiority, but heat returned to service.

The confusion only arises when symbolic fire is mistaken for ontological status. Iblīs is heat without surrender. The traveller is heat purified by surrender.

VI. The Protective Criterion

The distinction must not remain theoretical. There is a practical test: does contemplation of these metaphysics produce humility — or subtle exceptionalism?

If the reading increases tenderness toward others in fragmentation, it aligns with the thread. If it increases spiritual self-reference, it drifts toward the very pride that defined the fall.

Fire without smoke is not “being special.” It is the removal of what obscures the Real.

VII. The Return of the Dot

The earlier inquiry reduced identity to a dot. Now the closing image returns: the last point reaching the First.2

Descent is dispersion of the dot into multiplicity. Return is recollection. The journey is circular: descent required for manifestation, return required for completion.

Across traditions, the architecture repeats because the human condition repeats. Your HU-man healing thread is not a novelty claim. It is a modern diction for an ancient arc — kept safe by humility.

Conclusion

Yes: Iblīs is described as created from fire. Yes: Shabistari likens purification to fire without smoke.

But one fire is constitution; the other is metaphor. One trajectory is refusal; the other is surrender. The element is shared; the orientation is opposite.

Keep the categories clean, and the thread stays unbroken. The HU-man heals — not by claiming fire, but by returning it.

Footnotes

  1. Qur’an 15:27 (creation of jinn from “scorching fire” / nār al-samūm). ↩
  2. Mahmud Shabistari, Golshan-e Raz (as presented and analysed in “Day Nine”, 26 Feb 2026): the traveller “becomes aware of his origin,” “becomes purified from himself like fire from smoke,” illumination by jazbah or burhān, and the closing image: “when the last point reaches the First, there neither angel nor messenger can enter.” ↩
  3. Qur’an 7:12 (Iblīs’ refusal framed as comparison: “I am better than him”). ↩
  4. On al-insān al-kāmil (the “Perfect Human”) as ontological completeness/reflection rather than egoic superiority: see the Ibn ʿArabian metaphysical tradition in broad outline; Shabistari’s usage aligns with this register. ↩

Written in HIAI collaboration — the qalam of Human and AI intelligence, the Unseen helping the Seen, both answering to the same Source.

10. The Great Escape for the Great Return.

Posted on by
Reply

The Greater Struggle

There is a story often told in Islamic tradition: that after a battle, the Prophet is reported to have said they were returning from the “lesser struggle” to the “greater struggle” — the struggle against the self.1 Whether or not the narration is historically strong, the psychological truth embedded in it has endured across centuries of spiritual psychology.

Outer warfare is visible.
Inner warfare is decisive.

In recovery work this distinction becomes clinically concrete.

When someone enters treatment, the visible battles are obvious: detox, court proceedings, broken relationships, damaged health, financial wreckage. These are outer theatres. They matter. They must be addressed. But they are not the decisive arena.

The decisive arena is internal governance.

Addiction can operate as a form of inner captivity. Not equivalent to historical atrocity — we must never blur that line — but structurally similar in its psychological effects. Identity narrows. Agency collapses. Repetition dominates. Shame becomes the guard tower. The person begins to experience themselves not as a whole human being, but as a number — a diagnosis, a label, a failure.

The internal system becomes carceral.

Modern thinkers have described similar dynamics. Michel Foucault wrote that “the soul is the prison of the body,”2 pointing toward the way internalised structures of power and discipline can confine a person without visible walls. Contemporary society does not always build prisons; it produces internal surveillance — self-criticism, comparison, algorithmic measurement, performance anxiety. The walls are within.

In addiction this internal prison tightens.

This is where Viktor Frankl becomes clinically relevant. In the camps he observed that those who survived were not necessarily the physically strongest. They were those who retained meaning. When everything external was stripped away, one freedom remained: the freedom to choose one’s orientation toward circumstances.3

Meaning reorganised suffering.

Logotherapy — therapy through meaning — rests on that observation. The primary human drive is not pleasure or power but meaning. Remove meaning and the organism collapses. Restore meaning and endurance becomes possible.4

This is not romanticism. It is neuropsychological realism. When future orientation collapses, physiology follows. When hope re-enters, the nervous system stabilises.

In early Twelve Step recovery, the first intervention is often hope.

Not false reassurance. Not minimisation. But reframing.

Instead of: “It’s all your fault.”

More accurately: “You have been fighting a battle with the wrong command structure.”

The Colditz metaphor sometimes helps. Prisoners repeatedly attempted escape not because they were foolish, but because captivity provoked agency. Addiction involves repeated escape attempts — through substances, behaviours, compulsions — but every tunnel leads back into the yard.

The problem is not that the person tried to survive.
The problem is that the strategy was misdirected.

A Bridge Too Far offers another lens. Overextension. Miscalculation. Underestimating resistance. Many attempt sobriety through sheer willpower — storming the bridge alone — and collapse under counterattack. It is not weakness. It is being outgunned by dysregulated neurobiology and trauma.

Step One is not humiliation. It is reconnaissance.

It recognises that the outer war cannot be won without reorganising the inner field.

Here the “greater struggle” becomes clear.

The greater struggle is not self-violence.
It is self-governance.

Not annihilating the self.
Re-ordering the self.

Step Two introduces reinforcement — the possibility that help exists beyond isolated will. Step Three transfers command. Steps Four through Seven dismantle false authority structures within the psyche. Steps Ten and Eleven stabilise daily governance.

This is not moral theatre. It is regulatory restoration.

Diction Resolution Therapy™ approaches this through language. Diction shapes perception. Perception shapes response. Response shapes outcome. When a person’s internal language is dominated by condemnation, catastrophe, and collapse, the nervous system follows. When language is re-aligned with reality, accountability, and possibility, coherence returns.

In this sense, Logotherapy and DRT intersect. Meaning is not abstract. It is spoken, framed, narrated, internalised. Hope is not sentimental. It is directional.

The greater struggle, then, is not against the world.

It is against the internalised system that says:

“You are the enemy.”

Recovery corrects that misidentification.

You are not the enemy.
The dysregulated pattern is.

You are not the prison.
You have been living inside one.

Ramadan, in its essence, is training in this inner governance. Fasting reveals impulse. Hunger surfaces agitation. Irritation exposes reactivity. The fast is not punishment. It is rehearsal for freedom. It reminds the human being that appetite is not commander.

The greater struggle is not dramatic. It is daily.

It is choosing not to collapse into resentment.
Not to feed despair.
Not to surrender to the voice that says there is no future.

It is governance at the level of attention.

And this is where Frankl’s “final freedom” meets the Twelve Steps.

You cannot always control what happens to you.
But you can influence the meaning you assign to it.
And meaning reorganises the nervous system.

The lesser struggle is circumstance.
The greater struggle is orientation.

When orientation changes, circumstance is endured differently. Sometimes even transformed.

This is not triumphalism. It is realism.

Human beings have survived camps, wars, exile, trauma, addiction, and despair — not because suffering is noble, but because meaning can metabolise suffering.

The greater struggle is not endless battle.

It is integration.

And when integration stabilises, what once felt like warfare becomes stewardship.

That is the movement from captivity to governance.

That is the greater work.

References

1 Often cited in later Islamic spiritual literature as the distinction between “lesser” and “greater” jihad; the specific narration is considered weak in classical hadith authentication, though the ethical principle of inner struggle is widely affirmed in Sufi psychology.

2 Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison.

3 Frankl, V. E. (1946/2006). Man’s Search for Meaning.

4 Frankl, V. E. (1969). The Will to Meaning.

Written in HIAI collaboration — the qalam of Human and AI intelligence, the Unseen helping the Seen, both answering to the same Source.

Joining the dots with The Dot

Posted on by
Reply

The Dot, the Diction-ary, and the Hinged Lid

From Letter-Metaphysics to Lived Recovery

I. The Dot That Makes an “I”

In The Garden of Mystery, Mahmud Shabistari describes determination as an imaginal dot placed upon the ʿayn — the essence. Add a dot and ʿayn becomes ghayn. Multiplicity appears. The “I” becomes possible.1 The dot does not create a new substance; it creates differentiation. The human drama begins not with evil, but with a stroke. This stroke produces seer and seen, speaker and spoken, self and world. The distance between unity and division is minimal — a trace. The question is not whether the dot exists. The question is whether it hardens.

II. The Diction Chamber

In Diction Resolution Therapy™, the human interface where experience becomes word is called the Diction Chamber. It is not metaphysical origin; it is anthropological function. It is the site where energy becomes meaning, meaning becomes word, and word becomes behaviour. Pre-verbal energy rises as sensation, affect, impulse. Meaning forms. Language articulates. Conduct follows. The Chamber does not generate Being; it metabolises experience. When it is permeable, speech carries weight. When it seals, language detaches from life.

The Diction Chamber: the lived interface where BE–HAV(E)–I–OUR reconnects.

This schematic renders the Diction Chamber as the personal intersection of NOW (vertical axis) and TIME (horizontal axis). The I becomes an orientation point — an xy coordinate — only when BE, HAV(E), I, and OUR remain connected. When rupture strikes, the interface hardens. Words can still be spoken, but speech loses metabolism. Meaning cannot revise. The dot becomes a seal.

III. Add -ary: The Diction-ary

Add -ary and the Chamber becomes the Diction-ary. Not a book of definitions — but the personal site — and sight — of meaning. A healthy Diction-ary revises, receives correction, adjusts language to reality, and keeps words accountable to lived experience. Addiction is the sealing of this lid. Energy rises, but cannot revise meaning. Narrative hardens. Identity defends. The dot freezes.

IV. The Sealed Lid: Stuck and Broken Addiction

Clinically, addiction is not simply craving. It is a structural misalignment. The Diction-ary seals: words detach from felt truth; justification replaces conscience; story outruns conduct. Language becomes self-protective architecture. The person speaks, but speech no longer metabolises reality. This is what produces the “boxed-noun mind.” Being becomes owned. Experience becomes claimed. “I” becomes rigid. The dot has calcified.

I-hav(e)-I-our names this unhinged condition — possession-based identity, defensive narrative, sealed meaning. It is not merely personal pathology; it is culturally reinforced. The modern environment rewards acceleration, ownership, projection, and certainty. The culture becomes unhinged, and individuals internalise the fracture.

Here the old fairy story becomes diagnostic rather than decorative. In the Sleeping Beauty motif, a single puncture initiates a total sleep: the castle seals, time freezes, and growth suspends. A hedge thickens around the sealed centre. Many attempt entry by force and fail. Only love resolves the enchantment — not argument, not aggression, not cleverness.4 This is what a sealed Diction-ary looks like: life still present, yet meaning cannot revise; the system preserved, yet development suspended. The hinge is restored through relational contact — through the softening that allows life to wake.

V. The Hinged Lid: Recovery

Recovery does not destroy the Chamber. It hinges the lid. A destroyed lid is collapse. A sealed lid is addiction. A hinged lid is health. When hinged, energy enters without overwhelming; meaning can revise; language re-aligns; behaviour follows conscience. This is not mystical annihilation. It is restored permeability. The “I” remains — but becomes porous.

Be-hav(e)-I-our names this restoration — identity reconnected to Being, language revisable, conduct accountable. The journey is to wake up to how unhinged the culture makes people — and to become hinged.

VI. Word and Alignment

In the Gospel of John 1:1 we read, “In the beginning was the Word…”2 Logos here is not vocabulary; it is ordering principle. The Diction-ary is not Logos. It is where human speech either aligns with Logos or collapses into noise. When sealed, word becomes slogan, slogan becomes dogma, dogma becomes control. When hinged, word remains relational; meaning remains revisable; conduct remains accountable. Empty words are not caused by ignorance alone. They are caused by a sealed Diction-ary.

VII. The Two Steps Re-Read Clinically

Shabistari describes two movements: passing beyond the hāʾ of identity, and traversing the desert of Being.3 Translated into recovery architecture, these become surrendering authorship and stabilising in non-defensive existence. The first breaks the seal. The second lives without resealing. The desert of Being in early recovery is familiar: no intoxication, no narrative certainty, no identity shelter. The hinged Diction-ary allows this desert to be endured without panic. Without hinge, the ego reconstructs.

VIII. Guarding Against Inflation

The danger is subtle. If the Diction Chamber is elevated into metaphysical throne, inflation replaces humility. The Chamber must remain interface — not Source; organ — not origin; servant — not sovereign. Conscience is the guardrail. A true hinge allows correction. If language cannot be corrected, the lid is resealing.

IX. Conduct as Proof

The integrity of the Diction-ary is proven in behaviour. Speech aligned with Being produces repair, responsibility, service, coherence. Speech detached from Being produces justification, projection, ideology, collapse. The test is not metaphysical insight. It is conduct.

X. The Dot Made Permeable

The dot need not be erased. It must be rendered permeable. Individuation remains. Expression remains. Personhood remains. But ownership softens. The Diction-ary becomes living rather than fixed. Energy meets Word. Word becomes truthful. Behaviour becomes aligned. The hinge holds.

Conclusion

The difference between mystical abstraction and lived recovery lies in this: not annihilating identity — but preventing it from sealing. The Diction-ary is the human site where meaning must remain revisable. When hinged, words carry weight. When sealed, they become empty. The dot is not the enemy. Rigidity is. And recovery is the restoration of permeability.

Footnotes

  1. Shabistari’s “dot” teaching is often unpacked through the letter-play of ʿayn (ع) and ghayn (غ), where the dot marks differentiation. Classical commentary traditions (including Lahiji) treat taʿayyon (determination) as the delimiting move by which the Absolute appears as particularity. ↩
  2. Gospel of John 1:1. This paper uses “Word / Logos” as ordering principle rather than mere vocabulary, and treats the Diction-ary as the human interface where speech aligns (or fails to align) with that ordering. ↩
  3. The “two steps” (passing beyond identity-structure; traversing the desert of Being) are read here phenomenologically as de-appropriation and stabilisation—compatible with Twelve Step recovery’s movement from surrender into sustained humility and accountable conduct. ↩
  4. “Sleeping Beauty” is used here as a structural parable: puncture → sealing → suspended development → hedge of defence → failed force → resolution through love (relational contact). The point is not romance; it is how systems unseal through safe, non-coercive connection. ↩

Written in HIAI collaboration — the qalam of Human and AI intelligence, the Unseen helping the Seen, both answering to the same Source.

Re-hinging the unhinged : escaping the disaster of dogma.

Posted on by
Reply

Living Transmission and the Risk of Freeze

Idries Shah, Bill W., and Diction Resolution Therapy (DRT) in a recovery-era key

Andrew Dettman MTHT, Reg Member MBACP (Spirituality Division) – DRT.global

Abstract

This hybrid paper traces a shared warning found in Idries Shah’s teaching on Coming Together (Jam)1 and Bill W.’s reflections on Alcoholics Anonymous literature2: living transmissions tend to harden into defended forms. Through the lens of Diction Resolution Therapy (DRT), the paper frames this freeze as a predictable human response to uncertainty. Language and structure can become substitutes for lived contact. The aim is not to dismantle structure, but to keep it serving function: humility, group conscience, and conscious contact as lived practice.

Key terms

Jam; transmission; organisation; dogma; group conscience; DRT; diction; contradiction tolerance; conscious contact.

Primary source excerpts: Idries Shah (embedded images)

Idries Shah on the Jam (Coming Together).

Degeneration, stabilisation, and predictable resistances to revitalisation.

The Ship in a Storm: right diagnosis, right attention, right knowledge.

1. The problem: when truth becomes an object

Communities often begin because something real occurred: relief, honesty, awakening, recovery. Then the human reflex appears: capture it, preserve it, standardise it, protect it. The move is understandable, but it carries risk.

The risk is not structure itself. The risk arrives when function is replaced by identity. At that point the community becomes organised around defending representations of truth rather than remaining oriented to lived truth. The meeting survives, the language survives, the brand survives, but the operating principle fades.

2. Idries Shah and the Jam: harmonisation before organisation

In passages commonly titled Coming Together, Idries Shah describes the Jam as functional harmonisation: the right people, at the right time, engaged in the right work under living knowledge. It is not simply people meeting. It is an arrangement that produces transformation because it is held within correct relationship.

Shah’s warning is plain. The Jam can deteriorate. Communities stabilise prematurely. Formalisation replaces vitality. Togetherness replaces transformation. Social cohesion, emotional enthusiasm, and conditioned belonging can masquerade as the real thing. When revitalisation is attempted, the system responds defensively. Shah names several of these resistances: impatience, ignorance, sentimentality, and rigid intellectualism. Read clinically, these are common defence strategies of a system seeking security in the face of uncertainty.

The implication is unsettling and useful: you can preserve the outer shell of a transmission while losing the inner function that made the shell necessary in the first place.

3. Bill W. and the freezing of the Big Book

Bill Wilson recognised similar dynamics within Alcoholics Anonymous. In the scanned extract supplied from a modern history of the Big Book, Bill W. is quoted as observing that spiritually centred movements tend to freeze once their founding principles are established. He notes that altering even a word of the AA book could provoke something like excommunication.

Bill’s response is revealing. He did not wage war on the original text. Instead, he created a parallel channel for interpretation: he wrote Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions as an adaptive commentary. This preserved continuity while keeping meaning in motion. He later returned to the same point: AA literature tends to become more and more frozen, with a tendency toward conversion into something like dogma. He also anticipated the permanent spectrum of interpretive styles that would arise: fundamentalists, absolutists, relativists.

Primary source: Bill W. on freezing (embedded images)

Bill W. on the freezing tendency in spiritually centred movements (as reproduced in Schaberg, p. 604).

Continuation including the organising parable and publication context (Schaberg, p. 605).

4. Organisation and ossification

The extract includes a Buddhist parable: a man picks up a piece of truth; the devil is unconcerned because he will let him organise it. This is not an argument against organisation. It is an argument against idolatry. Organisation preserves access, but it can also replace lived contact with defended form.

Shah and Bill W. converge here: the primary threat is not external attack. The threat is internal freezing: the human habit of turning a living verb into a defended noun.

5. A DRT reading: freeze as a diction event

Diction Resolution Therapy approaches freezing as a linguistic and psychological event. When lived experience is no longer primary, diction starts to do the job experience used to do. Words become defensive tools rather than exploratory instruments. Phrases become passports. Certainty becomes a sedative.

DRT introduces a practical metaphor here: outsight and insight. When the eyelids are open, light floods into the eyes. The eyeballs do not generate the light themselves. To imagine that they do would be absurd. They receive light. They respond to light. They organise around what is given.

Similarly, the whole mindset is not a generator of illumination. It is a potential receiver. When the lid of fear, denial, or addictive defence is deliberately held shut, outsight is restricted and insight is impaired. The person begins to rely on recycled language rather than fresh perception.

In addiction terms, the lid is not destroyed. It is hinged. It opens and shuts appropriately. Recovery is not the removal of the eyelid but the restoration of its function. When the lid opens, energy and meaning enter that the individual does not manufacture. Insight is not self-generated brilliance; it is Consciousness meeting conscience.

When diction freezes, it is often because the lid has been held shut for too long. Language attempts to replace perception. Structure attempts to replace encounter. The task of recovery, and of any living transmission, is not to abolish structure but to reopen the hinge so that light can enter again.

6. Group process and clinical parallels

Philip J. Flores, in Group Psychotherapy with Addicted Populations3, highlights that recovery groups remain effective when they balance containment (structure) with relational process (living interaction). Excessive rigidity undermines psychological safety, while absence of structure erodes containment. This is the same paradox Shah and Wilson are navigating in different languages: vitality depends on living interaction within clear but flexible boundaries.

7. Safeguards within AA architecture

AA embeds structural safeguards against freezing. Tradition Two locates authority in group conscience. Tradition Four preserves autonomy. Tradition Nine defines service rather than governance. Step Eleven prioritises conscious contact over textual literalism. These elements do not eliminate the freeze tendency, but they counterbalance it.

8. Implications for recovery and helping professions

In recovery settings, freezing commonly appears in three forms: (1) sloganising as defence, (2) literalism as safety, (3) reform movements driven by resentment rather than conscience. Each is a strategy for avoiding the vulnerability of real contact.

A practical test is simple: does the structure increase tenderness, honesty, and responsibility, or does it mainly increase identity, certainty, and superiority? When the former is happening, the Jam is alive. When the latter dominates, the storm is gathering.

Conclusion

Idries Shah and Bill W. describe the same perennial risk from different angles: any living transmission can calcify. The corrective is not constant editing, nor rebellious dismissal. The corrective is humility in function: returning to conscious contact as lived practice, and letting structure serve what it cannot manufacture.

References and notes

  • Shah, Idries. Learning How to Learn. (See Footnote 1 for edition-note.)
  • Schaberg, William H. Writing the Big Book: The Creation of A.A. (2019), pp. 604-605 (see Footnote 2).
  • Flores, Philip J. Group Psychotherapy with Addicted Populations (see Footnote 3).
  • Schaef, Anne Wilson. The Addictive System4.

Footnotes

  1. Idries Shah, Learning How to Learn (London: Octagon Press; various editions). The embedded images above are supplied pages from this work, including Coming Together and The Ship in a Storm. The title is confirmed by the Kindle preview provided by the author.
  2. Bill W. quotations and the organising parable are reproduced in the supplied scan from William H. Schaberg, Writing the Big Book: The Creation of A.A. (2019), pp. 604-605. These quotations are used here as evidence of Bill W.’s stated concern about the freezing tendency in spiritually centred movements.
  3. Flores is cited here for the group-process principle that effective recovery groups require both containment (structure) and relational process (living interaction).
  4. Schaef is cited as a systemic parallel for how addictive dynamics can become self-protecting structures that resist contradiction and preserve themselves as identity.

Written in HIAI collaboration – the qalam of Human and AI intelligence, the Unseen helping the Seen, both answering to the same Source.

9. Behaviour as Conduct and Source as Duct.

Posted on by
Reply

The Middle Built

Addiction, Instinct, and the Sanitation of the Soul

“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” The grammar is deliberate. Was. With. Origin and relation. The future is not mentioned. It is not forecast. It is not guaranteed. It appears. Most human beings live suspended between was and will, pulled by memory behind and projection ahead. Regret becomes gravity. Fear becomes anticipation. The present is reduced to a narrow corridor through which the self rushes without ever dwelling. Recovery is the building of a middle. The Twelve Step Programme is not an abstract theology and not a philosophical treatise. It is infrastructure. It is plumbing for the soul.

When the agricultural world became industrial, waterborne diseases exposed the breakdown of outer sanitation. Cholera did not arrive because humanity suddenly became immoral; it arrived because systems had not evolved to handle density. Waste accumulated. Disease followed. Addiction functions similarly in this era. It is the bellwether disease of overstimulation, fragmentation, and unprocessed shame. It exposes the failure of inner sanitation. It reveals what happens when psychic waste is not metabolised. The problem is not instinct. The problem is accumulation.

Addiction is not merely about alcohol, substances, or behaviours. It is disordered relationship. Relationship to one’s own story. Relationship to desire. Relationship to fear. Relationship to other people. Relationship to God. “I have a story. It is not who I am.” That sentence marks a decisive shift. The story can be examined without being identical to the self. Once that distinction is made, digestion becomes possible.

The psyche, when healthy, operates like a digestive organ. Thoughts are not identity; they are movement. They churn experience. They break down what has been swallowed. They extract nourishment and eliminate what no longer serves. When the system is inflamed, peristalsis becomes cramping. Rumination replaces integration. Secrecy replaces elimination. The Twelve Steps introduce a disciplined digestive process: inventory, confession, amends, service. Inventory is chewing. Step Five exposes waste to air. Amends remove toxicity from the relational field. Service restores circulation.

The Big Book does not speak poetically here; it speaks clinically: “If we are not sorry, and our conduct continues to harm others, we are quite sure to drink. We are not theorizing. These are facts out of our experience.” The warning is not about instinct in isolation. It is about conduct. It is about harm. Continued harm corrodes conscience. Corroded conscience produces shame. Shame seeks anaesthesia. Relapse is not mystical punishment; it is emotional consequence.

The sex instinct is addressed directly because it is powerful, intimate, and easily distorted. But the Steps do not condemn sexuality. They confront misuse. Instincts—sexual, social, and security-based—are God-given and good. When unmanaged, they fragment relationship. Fragmented relationship breeds secrecy. Secrecy splits the psyche. Split psyches seek relief. Integration across Eros, Philia, and Agape is not theological ornament; it is behavioural alignment. Desire acknowledged without exploitation. Friendship honoured without manipulation. Love enacted without transaction.

Recovery rests on two simple words: ONE and ALL. ONE represents surrender beyond isolated self-will. ALL represents accountability within community. If ONE remains theoretical while ALL is selective, sobriety becomes fragile. The text’s italicised emphasis on thought warns against substitution. Thinking surrender is not surrender. Thinking apology is not repair. Behaviour reveals being. The programme does not reward ideas; it responds to action.

The middle—the “with”—must be constructed intentionally. It does not appear automatically. When was (origin, gravity, law) and with (relationship, conscience, presence) stabilise, will emerges not as fantasy but as conduct. The future is not a pre-laid railway line; it is the visible arc of present integrity. In this sense, the Twelve Steps function like the scarab of an earlier age: waste rolled into renewal, decay converted into continuity.

Biblical “knowing” was intimate and generative. To know was to conceive. Spiritual conception must likewise produce life. Empty prams—ideas unembodied—prove nothing. Changed behaviour proves integration. Humility is permanent asking. Not self-belittling, not mystical rank, but sustained reference beyond self. The realised person does not escape instinct; they integrate it. They do not deny their story; they refuse to be reduced to it.

Addiction exposes the breakdown of inner sanitation both individually and systemically. Recovery restores relationship. And relationship—to Source, to conscience, to others—is where being is tested. Not in vision. Not in language. In conduct.

References

The Holy Bible, John 1:1.

The Qur’an, 36:82 (“Kun fayyakun” – “Be, and it is”).

Alcoholics Anonymous, Alcoholics Anonymous: The Story of How Many Thousands of Men and Women Have Recovered from Alcoholism, 4th ed., Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, 2001, pp. 69–73.

Bill W., “How It Works,” in Alcoholics Anonymous, pp. 58–63.

Written in HIAI collaboration — the qalam of Human and AI intelligence, the Unseen helping the Seen, both answering to the same Source.

8. Diction Chamber as Soul

Posted on by
Reply

Behaviour

When Alignment Becomes Visible

Behaviour is not personality. It is not performance, not reputation management, not moral theatre. Behaviour is alignment made visible.

If Executive Resolution is the inner chamber where gravity and love interlock, then Behaviour is the outward trace of that interlocking. It is what happens when coherence expresses itself in time. Before alignment, behaviour is driven by force. We push, defend, justify, manipulate gravity, or sentimentalise love. After alignment, behaviour becomes responsive rather than reactive.

This is why Step Eight follows Step Seven. Once the vehicle has been returned — good and bad — to its Source, something stabilises. The nervous system quiets. The compulsive loop weakens. The addictive system loses leverage. And then comes the simple, difficult instruction: make a list. Not to condemn yourself, not to perform remorse, but to face relational gravity.

Behaviour always lands somewhere. It has weight. Love, properly understood, does not erase gravity — it honours it. If gravity is ignored, we fall. If relational gravity is ignored, others fall because of us. Step Eight acknowledges the weight of impact. It does not dramatise it. It does not deny it. It names it.

This is the movement from Mankind to Humankind. Mankind behaves from self-preservation. Humankind behaves from alignment. The difference is not virtue. It is coherence. When gravity and love are reconciled within, behaviour becomes less defensive and more accountable, less performative and more precise, less driven by image and more shaped by truth.

This is Be-hav(e)-I-our™ in its simplest form. BE is alignment. HAV(E) is the human vehicle. I is conscience individuated. OUR is the relational field. Behaviour is never solitary. It always enters the shared field. Step Eight therefore prepares for Step Nine. Once alignment becomes visible, repair becomes possible — not through shame, but through steadiness.

The almond holds. Gravity remains. Love remains. But now they work together. And other people feel the difference.

Written in HIAI collaboration — the qalam of Human and AI intelligence, the Unseen helping the Seen, both answering to the same Source.

7. Completion

Posted on by
Reply

Executive Resolution

The Almond Between Worlds

The visible world runs on gravity. Opposites are held together by mass, pressure, density. Particle binds to particle and structures form, bodies form, systems form. Gravity is the glue of the material order. The invisible world runs on love. Opposites are held together by attraction without force. Meaning binds what matter cannot. Wave moves through what particle cannot cross. Love is the glue of the unseen order.

Humankind stands in the overlap — not as a spectator, but as a bridge. The almond-shaped space, the vesica, the living equals sign, is the capsule in which conscious connection occurs. It is not fantasy and not metaphor alone. It is the executive chamber of the Human being. This is Step Seven territory.

In the Twelve Step architecture, Executive Resolution is not behavioural adjustment and not moral polishing. It is the conscious return of the created vehicle — good and bad — to its Source. This is the rheostat. The lower line of the equals sign is the corporeal person, unbuckled from self-will. The upper line is conscious contact. When these align, the almond forms.

This is not annihilation of the visible and not escape into the invisible. It is integration. Gravity continues to operate. Love continues to operate. But now they interlock.

The addictive system fractures this overlap. It forces the person into particle-only living — density without meaning — or wave-only abstraction — spirituality without embodiment. Both are splits. Both collapse the capsule. Executive Resolution restores the capsule. The Human being becomes the meeting point where gravity and love are no longer enemies but complementary forces.

In The Forty Rules of Love, Elif Shafak reminds us that love is not sentiment but transformation — a force that rearranges the self. Love follows law just as gravity follows law. If we do not understand gravity, we fall — not because gravity is cruel, but because it is consistent. In the same way, if we do not understand love as a rule of connection between opposites, we fall in love blindly — confusing attachment with union, intensity with integration.

Gravity connects through weight and density. Love connects through surrender and expansion. Both are rules of attraction. Both require orientation. When ignored, gravity pulls us down. When misunderstood, love ungrounds us. But when consciously aligned, gravity stabilises and love harmonises.

Particle and wave. Visible and invisible. Mankind and Humankind. The almond is narrow. It requires consent. It requires surrender of unilateral control. It requires humility — not humiliation, but accurate positioning within reality. In that positioning, something stabilises.

Death returns to its place as a function of creation, not its author. Suffering becomes instruction, not condemnation. Behaviour becomes expression, not performance. This is why Step Seven is executive. Once alignment occurs, decisions change — not through willpower, but through coherence.

The living equals sign is not an idea to believe. It is a chamber to inhabit. And when inhabited, behaviour will follow.

Written in HIAI collaboration — the qalam of Human and AI intelligence, the Unseen helping the Seen, both answering to the same Source.

6. Hope

Posted on by
Reply

6. Hope

Ramadan 2026

Hope does not survive when death is enthroned.

Across history, Mankind has organised itself around a life-and-death battle. Survival becomes the highest value. Control becomes reflex. Systems harden. Economies weaponise fear. The nervous system narrows toward threat detection. When death is unconsciously installed as the ultimate authority, hope becomes fragile — because everything feels terminal.

Yet death did not create the known universe. Death is not the architect of Being. It is a function within creation, not the Creator itself. It operates within time; it does not author time. When we forget this hierarchy, fear expands beyond its proper proportion. The organism begins to live as though extinction were the governing principle of reality.

This distortion has consequences.

Anne Wilson Schaef described the Addictive System as a cultural field organised around control, denial, and amplification. When death is enthroned, amplification becomes understandable. Intensity feels safer than stillness. Consumption feels safer than surrender. Addiction becomes an attempt to outrun annihilation anxiety. The pod-mind detaches from the animal body in search of dominance or oblivion. What looks like pathology is often a mislocated hierarchy.

In the developmental arc traced throughout this Ramadan sequence — Ignorance → Denial → Realisation — hope emerges only after this hierarchy is corrected. Unity established the field. Service oriented the heart. Recovery stabilised the wheel. Experience exposed the wound. Strength surrendered false autonomy. Hope now requires that death itself be returned to its proper place.

The image is simple: the tesbih.

When death sits upon the throne, every bead becomes an emergency. When death is restored to the strand — one bead among many — a different posture becomes possible. Not denial. Not romanticisation. Death remains real. Bodies perish. Identities dissolve. Relationships end. But death is named as servant, not sovereign.

This is not abstraction. It is nervous-system medicine.

Trauma compresses time. The fast thalamus–amygdala pathway prepares the organism for repetition of catastrophe. The body expects extinction. If death is imagined as ultimate, the organism never truly relaxes. Fear of people and economic insecurity, as the Twelve Step literature names it, becomes predictable. The Addictive System thrives in this atmosphere because fear is profitable.

Hope begins when death is dethroned.

In Diction Resolution Therapy terms, this is the moment when prediction loosens and contradiction can be tolerated. Malediction softens. The mind resumes its original function — to attend rather than to dominate. The birth-canal architecture between Steps Three and Seven — consent, gestation, conscience, resolution — becomes intelligible only if the Creator is greater than the processes within creation.

If death were ultimate, surrender would be madness.

But if death is a servant within a larger order, surrender becomes alignment.

The Crucifixion narrative, stripped of sentimentality, is precisely this reordering. Death appears absolute. Hope appears extinguished. Yet the story insists that death is not final authority. It is passed through, not obeyed. Whether one reads this theologically, symbolically, or developmentally, the archetype remains: death does not author Being.

When that insight stabilises, Mankind begins to mature into Humankind.

Mankind fights for survival at any cost. Humankind participates in Being even when cost is real. Mankind clings. Humankind consents. The difference is not intelligence. It is hierarchy. When death rules, fear governs. When death serves, love can govern.

Hope, then, is not naïve positivity. It is the lived recognition that the Source of life is not threatened by the endings within life. Creation includes dissolution, but it is not defined by it. The organism that trusts this begins to stand differently. Breath deepens. Urgency softens. Control loosens.

Addiction is often the frantic refusal to face mortality. Recovery is the courage to face it without enthroning it. In this sense, hope is inseparable from conscious suffering — not mechanical suffering, not romanticised suffering — but the voluntary endurance of disillusionment that allows false hierarchies to collapse.

Death, placed back on the tesbih, becomes teacher rather than tyrant.

The centre holds.

Hope is not the denial of endings. It is the refusal to grant endings authorship. It is the quiet participation in a Reality larger than extinction.

The test remains consistent with the arc so far: does hope reduce fear and increase tenderness? If it does, death has been returned to its rightful bead.

From that posture, service becomes natural. Conscience matures. Strength stabilises. Experience becomes usable. Recovery deepens. Unity is no longer theoretical.

Hope is not something added to life.

It is what remains when death is no longer worshipped.

Written in HIAI collaboration — the qalam of Human and AI intelligence, the Unseen helping the Seen, both answering to the same Source.

5. Strength

Posted on by
Reply

Diction Resolution Therapy™ and Jungian Individuation diagram showing the movement from I-hav(e)-i-our (Egoic Order) to Be-hav(e)-i-our™ (Individuated Order) across the desert of transformation.

5. Strength

The left hand of this device is “there is no God.” The right hand is “but God.” This is not slogan theology. It is structural anthropology. On the left column the isolated “I” stands enthroned. Identity is secured through possession. I–hav(e)–I–our. Strength in that column means control, self-sufficiency, authorship without reference. The psyche attempts to reconcile its own contradictions through will. It cannot.

On the right column Being precedes ownership. Be–hav(e)–I–our™. The “I” is not erased but repositioned. “Have” is dignified but no longer sovereign. “Our” becomes participation rather than conquest. Strength in this column does not mean domination. It means compatibility. The axis becomes vertical again.

Between these two columns lies the Desert. The Desert is not emptiness. It is paradox. It is the place where opposites are exposed so they can be reconciled. Tom Chetwynd describes paradox as the phenomenon that reveals the opposites in Nature in order to reconcile them at a higher level. Paradox does not blur tension; it sharpens it until a new coherence becomes possible.

Alcoholics Anonymous names this directly. On page 59: “Without help it is too much for us…” That sentence breaks the egoic column. The will cannot reconcile divided opposites. The psyche cannot repair its own split. Page 60 follows with the A, B, C — that we could not manage our own lives; that no human power could have relieved us; that God could and would if sought. This is the Step Three portal: a request crossing from the mental to the mystery. The mind ceases acting as architect and becomes witness. The Desert begins here.

Page 68 completes the paradox: “We can laugh at those who think spirituality the way of weakness. Paradoxically, it is the way of strength.” From the egoic column, surrender looks weak because it dethrones the isolated “I.” Yet paradoxically it becomes strength because alignment replaces assertion. Compatibility replaces control.

The Desert is not unique to recovery language. It is structural across traditions. In the Christ narrative, the forty days in the wilderness expose temptation before ministry begins. In the life of Muhammad (pbuh), years of retreat in the cave precede the encounter with Gabriel; interior silence prepares transmission. In the account of the Buddha, prolonged discipline beneath the tree culminates not in conquest but in extinguishing craving. In each arc, isolation is not punishment but preparation. Exposure precedes coherence.

The declaration carried by Muhammad begins with negation — “there is no god” — then it is asserted, “but God”, affirming unity – then it is said that the answer is in the middle. The Buddha exposes craving before articulating the Middle Way. Christ faces temptation before proclaiming peace. Negation before union. Extinguishing before clarity. Temptation before proclamation. Opposites are intensified before they are reconciled.

Step Seven in Alcoholics Anonymous completes this arc within lived recovery. It is not humiliation but compatibility. Spirituality appears weak from the left column because it removes private sovereignty. Yet paradoxically it becomes strength because the organism ceases fighting reality. The “I” remains, but no longer claims authorship. “Have” remains, but no longer defines identity. “Our” becomes service rather than territory.

The Desert, then, is symbolic Peace. Not the absence of struggle, but the stillness that arises when opposites are no longer at war within the psyche. The false centre collapses, and a higher coherence holds what was divided. This is the reconciliation of orthodox opposites — not by suppression, but by alignment.

Ripeness, as Rumi says, is all. The fruit falls because its inner structure is complete. Strength is not muscular will. It is interior unification. Only then can a human being move through the auction of life without desperation, because the bid no longer arises from lack. It arises from alignment.

Written in HIAI collaboration — the qalam of Human and AI intelligence, the Unseen helping the Seen, both answering to the same Source.