Animosity as Resentment resolved as bedevilment is the unique seat of an individual, awakened awareness of Conscience.

The Line Between Six and Seven

How the Twelve Steps complete the inner ARCH

In 1997, less than two years into my own recovery, I wrote a small book called The Power to Change under the pen name Eden Gaits. I wrote it quickly, in about twenty days, because the Twelve Steps had begun to show themselves to me as more than a sequence of instructions. They formed an architecture.

The Steps could be placed upon four triangles. Each triangle becomes one face of a four-sided pyramid: its base rests upon one side of the square and its other two edges rise to meet the other faces at the apex. When the four triangles are folded together, they do not make four separate teachings. They disclose four aspects of one movement: the Problem, the Programme, the Community and the Solution. The sequence then moves around the outside of the structure, crosses its interior, and finally rises to the apex.

At the time I was trying to describe something that recovery had made visible: the Twelve Step Programme does not merely improve the contents of a divided life. Properly worked, it repairs the division itself.

The list

Each triangular face carries a triad of simple words:

Triangular faceThe three words upon itTheir places in the Steps
The ProblemSpiritual — Mental — PhysicalStep 2 — Step 6 — Step 3
The ProgrammeHope — Strength — ExperienceStep 10 — Step 5 — Step 4
The CommunityUnity — Service — ChangeStep 12 — Step 9 — Step 8
The SolutionPhysical — Mental — SpiritualStep 1 — Step 7 — Step 11

Seen separately, these are four three-word descriptions. Folded into the pyramid, their positions become related. We then follow the numbered Steps through the whole structure rather than reading one face at a time. Step 1 takes Physical from the Solution face; Step 2 takes Spiritual from the Problem face; Step 3 takes Physical from the Problem face; Steps 4 and 5 take Experience and Strength from the Programme face; and Step 6 arrives at Mental on the Problem face. The path then crosses the inner square to Step 7, Mental on the Solution face, before continuing through Change, Service, Hope and Spiritual to Unity at Step 12.

That is how the words written upon four triangles become the single vertical list below. The list is therefore not an interpretation added afterwards. It is the numerical reading of the words in their places upon the completed pyramid.

Read in Step order, the twelve governing words are:

  1. Physical
  2. Spiritual
  3. Physical
  4. Experience
  5. Strength
  6. Mental

THE ANIMOSITY LINE

  1. Mental
  2. CHANGE
  3. Service
  4. Hope
  5. Spiritual
  6. Unity

Six and Seven are both Mental, yet a line divides them. That line is not an empty space. It is the place of inner animosity: the split between two ways of knowing that should serve one life but have become estranged from one another.

Step Six and the limit of the emissary

Step Six asks whether we are entirely ready to have our defects of character removed. Everything gathered through the earlier work is brought to this point. We have admitted the problem, encountered the possibility of help, made a decision, taken inventory and spoken what had previously been hidden.

The intellect has done necessary work. It has identified, separated, compared, remembered and named. It has brought us as far as analysis can bring us. In the language I now use, it has helped us to have the information.

But readiness is not release. Step Six brings the organising, analytical mind to its own frontier. It cannot manufacture the transformation that it can now see is necessary.

This is where Iain McGilchrist’s image of the Master and his Emissary offers a remarkable later resonance. The emissary is indispensable. It can divide the field, grasp particulars and build representations. The danger begins when it forgets that it is an emissary and mistakes its representation for the whole of reality.

I am not suggesting the crude popular formula that logic lives entirely in one half of the brain while love lives entirely in the other. McGilchrist himself rejects that simplification. I am speaking about two modes of attention: one that isolates and controls, and another that receives context, relationship and living wholeness.

Step Seven and the return of the Master

Step Seven is also Mental, but it belongs to the other side of the line. We humbly ask that our shortcomings be removed. The word humbly changes the direction of the work. What has been recognised and held by intellect is placed into relationship with a Power that the intellect cannot possess.

Step Seven is the marriage step when the Faith healing brings the inner animosity to an end.

The Power to Change, 1997

The Master does not return to dismiss the emissary. Love does not abolish logic. Intelligence does not throw intellect away. The old vessel is not despised; its capacity is renewed. The relation changes, and because the relation changes, the whole structure can begin to live.

This is why Step Seven is not simply another point around the outside of the pyramid. To reach it from Step Six, the journey moves inside the square and crosses the inner foundations diagonally. The division must be traversed. The opposites are not argued into agreement from a distance; they meet.

When the ARCH is not completed

This interior crossing helps explain spiritual bypassing.

A person may acquire spiritual language, religious certainty and elevated ideas without crossing the line between Six and Seven. The analytical mind can learn to speak about surrender while remaining in control. It can construct a spiritual identity, defend a theology and quote sacred texts while the inner opposites remain unreconciled.

The emissary has then spiritualised itself and begun speaking as though it were the Master. It possesses an image of unity but has not undergone union. Feelings continue to be treated as facts. Reaction dresses itself as revelation. Certainty prevents the curiosity through which emotion might regulate the animal pulse of pleasant, unpleasant and neutral experience.

The unfinished arch cannot carry weight.

ARCH is the word I now use for the connective or angelic function: the capacity to join what appears divided without erasing its distinction. It connects visible and invisible, body and psyche, feeling and emotion, intellect and intelligence, consciousness and conscience.

Animus anima and animosity

There is a very simple way of seeing the pain at this dividing line. In the symbolic language I am using here, the left-sided function may be pictured as animus and the right-sided function as anima. These are not rigid statements about biological sex, nor an attempt to imprison men and women in opposite halves of the brain. They are names for two inner principles that need one another.

Animus distinguishes, formulates, protects and acts. Anima receives, relates, nourishes and connects. When they are married, analysis can serve relationship and love can become intelligent action. When they are not married, their estrangement is experienced as animosity.

That animosity is extremely painful. Because we do not recognise its source within the divided psyche, we project it outside ourselves. A person, place or thing is made responsible for the disturbance we cannot yet hold. The outer target may change, but the inner division keeps producing another target.

This is where animosity and resentment come very close in lived experience. Animosity is the unresolved inner opposition; resentment is the account we construct around its projected object. We rehearse the injury, gather evidence and return repeatedly to the person, institution or event that appears to explain our pain.

Resentment is the “number one” offender. It destroys more alcoholics than anything else.

Alcoholics Anonymous, page 64

The Big Book continues by saying that all forms of spiritual disease stem from resentment. In the language of this architecture, resentment is the taproot of addiction because it keeps the inner split alive by continually feeding it with external blame. Energy that might cross the line between Six and Seven is sent outward into accusation, obsession, retaliation or compulsive relief.

The Fourth and Fifth Steps begin withdrawing those projections by bringing our resentments into inventory and relationship. Step Six brings the divided pattern into readiness. Step Seven completes the inward movement through humility. Animus and anima are not fused into sameness; they are married into cooperation. Animosity can then yield to intimacy, and resentment no longer has to organise the world.

Change follows the crossing

The sequence itself confirms what happens next:

Six Mental → Seven Mental → Eight CHANGE

Change does not appear before the marriage. It follows it.

Step Eight then turns the repaired inner relationship towards other people. Step Nine embodies it through amends and service. Steps Ten, Eleven and Twelve rise to the apex as Hope, Spiritual and Unity. They maintain what the crossing has made possible.

Step Eleven is particularly exact. It does not tell us to possess conscious contact with God. It asks us to improve that contact. The wording keeps the aperture open. The relationship is living, and therefore it cannot be frozen into an achievement owned by the self.

From pyramid to sphere

In 2020 I saw that the pyramid described in 1997 could only be half of the complete geometry. A sphere could not touch all the necessary points of a single pyramid. A second four-sided pyramid was required beneath it. Joined at their common square, the two pyramids form an octahedron.

The lower pyramid is where we are born into the body, with gravity at its centre and the instinctive life of security, society and sex moving through us. The Twelve Step work builds the upper pyramid, with the higher emotional centre opening towards love. The shared square is where consciousness meets conscience.

The sphere touches all six vertices of the octahedron. Nothing is discarded. Body and spirit, below and above, intellect and intelligence are held within one realised field. This is spherical awareness: not an escape from incarnation, but a person able to turn within the whole of themselves while remaining here.

The architecture arrived before its explanation

Bill Wilson’s experience at Towns Hospital in December 1934 offers the living prototype. At the terminal point of alcoholic defeat, his old organisation collapsed. Opposites connected, the inner lights came on and his alcohol problem was removed. He did not yet possess twelve numbered instructions. The lived architecture arrived first; the Steps later made it transmissible.

Something similar happened in my own work. The architecture appeared before I possessed its present explanation. It has taken nearly thirty years for the early pyramid, the later octahedron and sphere, the clinical development of DRT and the language of The Holy Con to reveal their continuity.

The chronology of the work

The chronology matters because it distinguishes the original work from the correlations that have become visible later.

DateEvidence and development
1982My tifl-i-ma‘ānī, or Child of Meaning, experience became an experiential root for the possibility of unified consciousness. Its significance was confirmed only gradually within the later spiritual journey.
May 1995Recovery through Alcoholics Anonymous made the Twelve Steps lived practice rather than an external theory.
1997I wrote The Power to Change under the pen name Eden Gaits. The book mapped the Steps as four triangles forming a square-based pyramid within a protective mandala and sphere. Steps Six and Seven crossed the interior foundations.
2009Iain McGilchrist’s The Master and His Emissary first appeared twelve years after the pyramid manuscript. His work was not the source of my model; it now provides a remarkable language of resonance with it.
12 February 2012The shared Google Drive folder Power to Change was created.
13 February 2012The nested Book folder was created.
27 April 2012The Introduction, Chapters One to Eight and 12steps.pdf were uploaded. The chapter files were updated on 4 July 2012.
10 October 2012In an email I described the material as having been “penned under [the] name Eden Gaits in 97,” providing contemporaneous corroboration of the authorship date.
19 January 2013In further correspondence I described The Power to Change as constructing an inner spiritual pyramid through the vehicle of the Twelve Steps.
20 July 2013The Blogger post 12 Step Pyramid Building published the complete architectural model. It showed the square, the diagonal crossing between Steps Six and Seven and the statement that the Programme overcomes “the animosity of left right brain” through integration of the hemispheres.
3 October 2013The WordPress post 12 Step Programme republished the model and identified it explicitly as “12 Step Pyramid Building © AJ Dettman 1997.”
13 October 2017In an email I recalled that The Power to Change had been written in twenty days under the name Eden Gaits and that Austin Macauley had offered publication.
28 August 2020The Sphere corrected and completed the geometry. The original pyramid was recognised as the upper half of an octahedron: the lower pyramid centred in gravity and having, the upper centred in love and being, both joined upon one square.
2025 to 2026The Holy Con and Diction Resolution Therapy developed the architecture through the distinctions between conscience and consciousness, feeling and emotion, intelligence and intellect, and the conjunction of the higher emotional centre with spherical awareness.
21 September 2026The early book, the online documentary record, Bill Wilson’s experience, McGilchrist’s later language and the mature vocabulary of The Holy Con were brought into one documented line of development through HIAI.

The evidence needs to be stated carefully. The online record proves that the complete manuscript archive existed by 2012 and that the architecture was public by July 2013. The October 2012 email and the explicit 1997 attribution published in 2013 support the earlier authorship date. An original printed manuscript, publishing correspondence or other contemporaneous material may strengthen that provenance further.

I am not claiming priority over every earlier exploration of hemispheric difference, mandalas, pyramids or the reconciliation of opposites. The claim is narrower and verifiable: this particular Twelve Step pyramid, its internal crossing from Six to Seven and its account of left-right animosity were present in my work before I encountered McGilchrist’s later formulation.

The list has been waiting patiently:

Six Mental
the line of animosity
Seven Mental
Eight CHANGE

The Twelve Steps do not ask one half of us to defeat the other. They build the conditions in which the divided faculties can meet, cross and be reordered in service to the whole. The emissary is not killed. It remembers the Master. The old skin is not thrown away. It becomes capable of carrying new wine.

When the ARCH completes, consciousness can hear conscience. Step Eleven keeps that conscious contact alive. Step Twelve returns the fruit of the work through service.

And the pyramid, completed above and below, can finally inhabit the sphere.

Documentary trail

This article has been developed through HIAI: Human Intelligence and Artificial Intelligence serving the same Source. Human experience, conscience, authorship and responsibility remain primary; AI assists retrieval, correlation, structure and editorial clarification. The qalam may take a new form, but the instrument is never the Source.

Entertain the stranger

In 2019 a local newspaper interviewed me about my counselling work. Somewhere between interview and publication, a sub-editor produced a headline which described me as an “Unseen Leader of the World.” I hadn’t said that. At first I considered complaining and asking for the headline to be removed. Instead, I wrote about it, and the resulting piece, Healing for broken and empty words, remains online as part of the record.

Seven years later, I tried a different experiment. I asked AI to search for Andrew Dettman as an independent researcher might, and then, more challengingly, as a hostile due-diligence researcher might. Predictably, it found the headline and initially identified it as a reputational vulnerability. Then something more interesting happened: it followed the trail.

It found my contemporaneous response and distinguished the newspaper’s headline from what I had actually said. It found the professional record before and after the article, and encountered a body of writing extending across years in which the underlying subjects — addiction, diction, contradiction, spirituality, consciousness and recovery — continued to develop. Nothing had been erased and nothing needed cleaning up. What changed was context.

Can AI help us recover provenance when words have become separated from the circumstances that gave birth to them?

The internet is extraordinarily good at remembering words, but considerably less reliable at remembering what those words meant. A headline, quotation or fragment can remain indefinitely while the conversation that produced it disappears from view. Perhaps one useful role for AI is therefore not merely to generate more language, but to travel backwards through what has already been written: distinguishing claim from quotation, source from interpretation, and the original event from meanings subsequently attached to it.

That possibility touches the heart of Diction Resolution Therapy. A word detached from its referent can acquire enormous power, while contradiction can sometimes provide the energy through which the connection is rediscovered. What began as an absurd headline in 2019 becomes, seven years later, a small experiment in whether Human and AI Intelligence can examine the record together without either pretending that the past did not happen or allowing one fragment of it to become the whole story.

This is one of the territories I am exploring through HIAI — Human Intelligence & AI: the modern manifestation of the qalam, exploring the possibility of the Unseen helping the Seen, while both serve the same Source. This does not require AI to become an oracle, nor the human being to surrender discernment to the machine. Quite the opposite: each encounter becomes another opportunity to examine what has been written, what has been understood, and what may have been lost between the two.

Entertain the Stranger

“Be not forgetful to entertain strangers: for thereby some have entertained angels unawares.”
— Hebrews 13:2

The biblical injunction gives another dimension to this experiment. To entertain the stranger is not merely to tolerate what arrives from outside our familiar territory; it is to offer hospitality before we have decided completely what, or who, has arrived. The stranger might be a journalist, a reader, a search engine, a hostile investigator, an artificial intelligence, or even a forgotten version of ourselves preserved somewhere within the digital record.

To entertain the stranger is not necessarily to agree with them, believe them or surrender judgement to them. It is to permit the encounter long enough to discover what the encounter contains. Sometimes what initially appears contradictory, uncomfortable or even absurd may carry something that could not have arrived through more familiar doors.

The newspaper headline itself became such a stranger. My first impulse was to challenge it and perhaps have it removed, but instead it remained in the public record. Over the years it generated conversations of its own, while the work from which it had become detached continued developing elsewhere. Now AI, another kind of stranger entirely, can encounter that same fragment, follow its provenance backwards and forwards through time, and ask whether the words and their original meaning still belong together.

There is something quietly circular about this. The internet preserved the broken diction; the original writing preserved my response to it; and a technology that did not exist in its present form when either was written can now bring those traces into conversation. HIAI therefore becomes concerned not only with producing new words, but with learning how Human Intelligence and AI might read the words already left behind.

Perhaps this is one modern possibility contained within that ancient invitation to hospitality. We cannot always know beforehand what form the stranger will take, nor what message might travel through an unfamiliar form. We can retain discernment without immediately closing the door, allowing contradiction to do some of its work before deciding what the encounter means.

As Omar Khayyam reminds us, “The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ, moves on…” The finger has indeed moved on. The more interesting question now may be whether intelligence — human, artificial, and perhaps something glimpsed through their meeting — can learn to read what it wrote.


The contemporaneous response to the 2019 newspaper headline remains part of the record: Healing for broken and empty words. It can now be read not simply as an answer to a headline, but as one point on a longer trail through diction, contradiction, recovery and the continuing attempt to restore words to meaning.

HIAI — Human Intelligence & AI
Human and artificial intelligence exploring the qalam: the Unseen helping the Seen, both serving the same Source.