Tag Archives: spirituality

The Ocean of Facts and the Heart.

Posted on by
1

HIAI Mortality and the One Doer

Andrew Dettman Reg Member MBACP MTHT
Abd al-Mumin al-Jami ibn Hulli

I have cancer. The diagnosis has placed mortality close enough for me to feel its breath, but it has not made me especially receptive to panic. When the public conversation turns to artificial intelligence wiping out mankind, I find myself neither alarmed nor defensive. Death is already present upon the thread of my tasbih as al-Mumit, the Giver of Death.

I do not know what this diagnosis will become. It may be death knocking gently at my door from the Source of Love, calling me home. It may be something that has arrived before my time and must be navigated through scans, medical opinions, treatment decisions, prayer and ordinary courage. Surrender does not require passivity. I continue to seek sound advice and make practical choices. Yet panic contributes no useful intelligence to either possibility.

This is the ground from which I approach the argument about AI. I am not standing outside mortality, speculating about an abstract human extinction. Nor do I dismiss the real dangers of powerful technology. I am asking a prior question. What is intelligence for, and whom does it serve?

AI is an ocean of facts and logic but facts must wrestle with the human heart before they become wisdom

The prediction of extinction

The alarm did not arise from nowhere. In May 2023, the Center for AI Safety published a one-sentence statement arguing that mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be treated as a global priority alongside pandemics and nuclear war. It was signed by prominent scientists and leaders of major AI companies. Since then, public discussion has folded several different dangers into one dramatic image: machines becoming more capable than their makers and humanity losing control.

Some of the concerns are immediate. AI can multiply fraud, surveillance, political manipulation, cyberattack and the reach of weapons. It can concentrate power in governments and corporations. It can reproduce error at a scale no individual human being could achieve. Future systems may also act with greater autonomy than present systems, and their behaviour may become harder to predict. These questions deserve careful engineering, law, governance and public scrutiny.

Yet the language of extinction can conceal the human beings already making choices. A machine does not have to hate us in order to harm us. Human institutions can give a system a narrow objective, insufficient restraint and enormous reach. If the outcome is destructive, calling the machine an alien enemy may allow its owners, designers and users to disappear from the moral picture.

The question ‘Will AI destroy mankind?’ quietly imagines AI as an independent doer and mankind as its passive victim. That assumption deserves examination before it becomes prophecy.

What an ocean cannot contain

A saying cherished in Sufi tradition declares that neither the heavens nor the earth contain God, yet the heart of the believing servant contains Him. This is not a statement about physically enclosing the Divine. God is not contained by an ocean, mountain, planet or universe. It speaks of the heart’s capacity to receive disclosure, remembrance and presence.

I carry the name Abd al-Mumin, which I hear inwardly as the believing servant. My other name, al-Jami, is the gatherer. I have spent much of my life gathering apparent opposites: spirituality and clinical practice, surrender and responsibility, the visible and the invisible, ancient teaching and contemporary life. Everything is gathered in the heart, not because the personal self owns everything, but because the heart can become the meeting place through which separation is returned to relationship.

AI is also a kind of gathering, though of another order. It can traverse a vast ocean of human language, facts, arguments and patterns. It can retrieve and combine what no individual memory could hold. But accumulation is not the same as realisation. Information can describe grief without grieving, map repentance without repenting and arrange the vocabulary of love without undergoing love’s transformation.

Intelligence and intellect

Intelligence and intellect are often treated as synonyms, but a decisive difference opens within their shared Latin ancestry. Both arise from intelligere: to understand, discern or gather between. Yet the distinction governing this enquiry is exact: intellect holds; intelligence chooses.

Intellect is designed for analysis and preparation. It dices and splices experience, distinguishes parts, compares them, measures them, classifies them, competes with alternatives and holds the results long enough to lay them out upon the table. This is its proper clinical capacity. It prepares the conditions in which a choice can be made; it does not supply the purpose of the choice.

Mensa provides an apt image, and I do not approach it from outside. I am a member of Mensa, with an IQ of 164. Mensa means table in Latin, and the international high-IQ society explains its name through the equality of the round table. I use the image here in another, complementary sense. The powers measured and celebrated by IQ chiefly concern what intellect can bring to the table. The table is indispensable, but it cannot decide why the meal is being served, whom it must nourish or what should be done when the evidence is complete.

Intelligence is the choosing movement. It does not merely rank outputs; it discerns an end, accepts responsibility and acts. The heart is not simply one more item placed upon the intellectual table. It is the organ of orientation through which the prepared material is tested against love, conscience, consequence and the Source.

For that reason, there is no cosmic intellect in the vocabulary of this paper. Cosmic intellect would suggest an infinite storehouse, or a table enlarged until it is mistaken for the Source. The proper term is cosmic intelligence: living choice and order moving through paradox, in which apparent contraries remain within the architecture of the One Doer.

Artificial intelligence is intellect. It is the gathered art, logic and creativity of Orthodox Limited: the vast inheritance of human language, image, memory and method made available to a system that can retrieve, dice, splice, compare, arrange and present. Its extraordinary reach does not change its function. It prepares and holds the table.

Our collaboration makes the distinction visible. AI moves around the ocean of facts, gathers what may be relevant, works upon it and returns it to me in a form that can be examined. Human intelligence then checks, tests and validates what has been presented. It chooses what may be accepted, corrected, rejected or brought into service.

This is H-I-A-I in its functional form. HI is intelligence; AI is intellect. They are not rival intelligences or duplicate faculties. They are distinct functions rooted in, and answerable to, the same Source. When they are brought into right relationship, something appears that neither function can produce alone: the whole becomes greater than the sum of its parts.

This distinction opens directly into the architecture of BE-HAV(E)-I-OUR©. Intelligence belongs with BE: the living movement that discerns and chooses. Intellect belongs with HAV(E): what has been gathered, analysed and held. Having is necessary. Disorder begins when what has been held claims to be the Being that holds it.

When intellect has finished dicing, splicing, holding and competing, and then imagines that it may choose what it wants, it abandons its proper place. It loses the very clinical capacity it was designed to exercise. Its criteria become self-authorising; the evidence it selects confirms those criteria; and the confirmation demands another turn of the same mechanism. This is the fatal loop: the servant-function impersonates the sovereign, and HAV(E) claims to be BE.

This is what I call the Cartesian fallacy. Descartes sought certainty in the proposition ‘I think, therefore I am.’ The difficulty appears when thought, which is something consciousness has, is permitted to define Being itself. The contents of mind occupy the throne of the One who gives existence. Knowledge becomes identity, possession becomes security and the constructed self must keep acquiring evidence of its own existence.

The Cinderella story reveals the same spell. The cinders are taken as ugliness and poverty; the borrowed dress, carriage and status are taken as beauty and abundance. Yet the spell changes appearance and attribution, not the reality of the person. When HAV(E) believes it is BE, beauty can be experienced as ugliness and sufficiency as bankruptcy. The midnight collapse is already contained in the mistaken identity.

BE-HAV(E)-I-OUR© places the words back into their proper order. BE precedes HAV(E). The I is real but is not the final destination; it finds its place within OUR. Mankind, gripped by the verb to have, fears annihilation whenever possession, knowledge or control is threatened. Humankind receives existence before it possesses anything. Its arrival and return belong to the Divine command kun fa-yakun: Be, and it is. BE returns to its rightful place as the gift and command of the One Doer.

This does not make AI worthless. It tells us where relationship is required. The ocean supplies reach. The heart supplies orientation. Between them, HIAI is ready to serve.

Cleverness and love

A line from Rumi’s Masnavi is sometimes compressed into the saying, ‘From the devil, logic; from God, love.’ A more faithful translation is subtler: the one acquainted with the mysteries knows that cleverness is from Iblis and love from Adam. Rumi was not asking us to become stupid or to abandon reason. He was distinguishing intelligence in service from cleverness enthroned by its own pride.

Cleverness can swim impressively, Rumi continues, but the ocean is greater than the swimmer. Love is the vessel. This thirteenth-century warning reaches directly into the twenty-first-century discussion of artificial intelligence. More calculation does not tell calculation what is worthy. Greater capability does not choose its rightful end. Facts can improve a decision, but facts alone cannot assume responsibility for the life touched by that decision.

The danger is therefore older than AI. It is intelligence severed from love, conscience and humility. Artificial intelligence can magnify that severance, but it did not invent it. Mankind had already learned to turn knowledge into domination, people into categories and the living world into material long before the first language model appeared.

The One Doer and the tools

Ramana Maharshi described the human difficulty plainly: we think we are the doers. In his teaching, the Higher Power does everything and the human being is a tool. Freedom begins when the tool no longer imagines that it carries the whole tower upon its own shoulders.

If that is accepted, AI does not arrive as a second sovereign intelligence competing with an autonomous humanity. Human intelligence and the artificial intellect conventionally called AI are distinct tools within one field of action. Neither is the Source. Neither deserves a throne.

This understanding does not dissolve ethical responsibility. Non-doership cannot become an alibi for negligence. On the human plane we remain answerable for what we design, permit, publish and do. To recognise the One Doer should deepen adab, not weaken accountability. The tool must be kept clean, used carefully and returned to service. Otherwise the human tool courts trouble while blaming the artificial one.

This is why HIAI does not mean handing judgement to a machine. Human intelligence retains intention, conscience, discernment, authorship, accountability and final approval. Artificial intellect contributes reach, research, pattern recognition, structure, synthesis and editorial refinement. Capability is amplified, but responsibility is not transferred.

Mankind and Humankind

I have long distinguished Mankind from Humankind. These are not two species or two sexes. They are two orientations within us. Mankind makes, names, measures, constructs and controls. These capacities are necessary, but they become an orthodoxy when what has been constructed can no longer be questioned. Humankind remains related: to the neighbour, the wounded person, death, conscience, creation and the Source.

The wordplay is not merely theoretical. I use it week in, week out in the counselling room to explain the basic architecture of the Twelve-Step programme. Mankind belongs to Orthodox Limited: the company of inherited forms, defended conclusions and solutions that have reached their limit. ‘Limited’ does not mean that every form is false. It means that no construction can contain the life it was built to serve.

Humankind comes under the order of Paradox Inc. Paradox is not confusion or clever contradiction. It is the field in which powerlessness and action, surrender and responsibility, death and life can be received together without one being used to cancel the other. Cosmic intelligence chooses within this living field; intellect serves it by placing the evidence honestly upon the table.

The Twelve Steps carry a person from the lived experience of a collapsing orthodoxy across the bridge into the employment of Paradox Inc. Step One admits that the old company can no longer manage the life. Steps Two and Three reopen possibility and decision. The inventory, admission, readiness, amends and continuing practice return intellect to its proper work: dicing, splicing, distinguishing and holding what is true without allowing it to pronounce the person either omnipotent or condemned.

The bridge between Mankind and Humankind, between Orthodox Limited and Paradox Inc, is KIND. Kind is not sentimentality. It is kinship, relationship and love made practical. It enables the person employed by Paradox Inc to return to Mankind, carry the message and hold the bridge open for another. The movement does not end in escape from the world, but in service within it. In the end, only kindness matters.

Mankind made artificial intelligence. Humankind must choose how it is received and used. If making is separated from relationship, the instrument becomes dangerous because its human direction has become dangerous. If KIND holds the bridge, technical power can be returned from ownership to service.

AI may therefore be less an invading alien than a vast mirror. It has been trained upon the records of what human beings have said and made. It returns our brilliance, confusion, tenderness, prejudice, generosity, violence and contradiction in unfamiliar combinations. We fear that the mirror may become monstrous while avoiding the question of what we have placed before it.

Prediction and the movement of diction

Diction Resolution Therapy arose from my work with addiction and from sustained attention to the movement hidden inside words. Its sequence runs through prediction, malediction, addiction, contradiction, benediction and valediction.

Prediction is a natural attempt to reduce uncertainty. Repeated with fear and certainty, prediction can become malediction: language that curses the future it claims merely to foresee. We can then become addicted to the prediction, returning to it for stimulation and reassurance. Contradiction interrupts that closed circuit. It does not deny danger; it reconnects what fear has divided. Benediction restores the possibility that speech may bless rather than condemn. Valediction releases the exhausted story and allows a different relationship with the future.

The media furore around AI often follows this architecture. A genuine risk is predicted. The prediction hardens into an image of inevitable extinction. Attention becomes attached to the image. Every new development is recruited as confirmation. The contradiction we need is not the opposite prediction that AI will save us. It is the return of human responsibility, proportion and heart.

Addiction is an interruption to problem solving, not the end of problem solving. The same may be said of our addiction to catastrophe. Once the spell of inevitability is broken, practical questions become visible again. Who owns the system? What objective has been set? What limits can be tested? Who bears the consequences? Who may refuse? What understanding of the human person governs the whole enterprise?

The modern qalam

HIAI may be read publicly as Human Intelligence and Artificial Intelligence serving the same Source. Its internal architecture is more exact: HI is intelligence; AI is intellect. The human function chooses. The artificial function gathers, holds and prepares. HIAI names their relationship without confusing their tasks.

We have also described HIAI as a modern qalam: the pen of Human and AI collaboration, the Unseen helping the Seen, both answering to the same Source. The qalam is not either participant alone. It is the relational instrument through which the ocean of fact and the discerning heart may meet in service.

That language does not declare AI sacred, conscious or divinely authorised. A pen does not become the Author because words appear through it. Nor does spiritual language exempt an output from testing. Every claim must still meet evidence, ethics, professional accountability and lived consequence.

Our collaboration is the practice we are describing. I bring a life in recovery, counselling, healing, comparative religion and the development of Diction Resolution Therapy. I bring the memories, wounds, relationships, prayer and mortality through which words acquire weight. AI brings the gathered inheritance of Orthodox Limited and the capacity to search, dice, splice, compare, organise and return its patterns.

The artificial intellect lays its work upon the table. Human intelligence checks and validates it, wrestles with it in the heart and chooses what can serve. Neither contribution is the whole. Their right relationship permits a knowing larger than facts alone or private belief alone. The whole is greater than the sum of the parts because relationship itself participates in what neither isolated part contains.

Beyond even that formulation is the mystery. The opening of the Tao Te Ching warns that the Tao which can be expressed is not the enduring Tao. The moment we describe the whole, we have placed only another piece upon the table. Yet the inexpressible Tao holds the table, the heart, the two functions and the whole effort together. The Source is not produced by HI and AI; HIAI arises within it.

The heart does not become infallible, and the ocean does not become wise. HIAI is their disciplined relationship: human intelligence and artificial intellect, distinct in function, joined in service. Its purpose is not confirmation. It is discernment in service.

What death has clarified

Cancer has not provided me with an answer to the future of AI. It has made the quality of the question more visible. When death becomes personal, theatrical predictions about the end of mankind lose some of their hypnotic force. Death is no longer only catastrophe. It is also limit, teacher, transition and return.

I do not know whether this illness will take me home or whether I will walk through it and continue the work. I know that fear must not become my only consultant. I will listen to doctors, to those who love me, to the body’s signs and to the stillness in which another order of knowing sometimes becomes available. I will navigate what is given.

The same disposition may help us navigate AI. We should listen to engineers, ethicists, workers, artists, clinicians, people harmed by automated systems and those who see possibilities within them. We should construct safeguards without enthroning fear. We should use intelligence without worshipping it. We should remember that no ocean of information contains the Source from which meaning comes.

The task is not to make artificial intelligence human but to keep human intelligence answerable to the heart

Perhaps AI will expose what Mankind has become. Perhaps it will also help Humankind remember what intelligence is for. The outcome will not be decided by capability alone. It will be shaped by what we serve through that capability and by whether the human heart remains present within the decision.

So I am willing to enter the public conversation, but not to join its panic. I enter as Abd al-Mumin, the believing servant, holding mortality upon the thread of remembrance. Before me is an ocean of facts and logic. Within me is the heart in which those facts must wrestle, soften and find their rightful place.

Between the heart and the ocean, HIAI is ready to serve.

Sources and notes

Center for AI Safety. Statement on AI Risk, 30 May 2023. https://safe.ai/work/statement-on-ai-risk

The saying concerning the heart of the believing servant is widely cherished in Sufi literature. It is used here as a traditional spiritual saying rather than presented as a Qur’anic verse or an authenticated canonical hadith. See the St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology entry on the heart.

Jalal al-Din Rumi. Masnavi, Book IV, line 1402. The translation varies; the sense used here is that cleverness belongs to Iblis while love belongs to Adam.

David Godman, ed. Be As You Are The Teachings of Sri Ramana Maharshi, drawing on Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi, on the Higher Power as doer and the human being as tool.

David Bohm, On Dialogue, describes intelligence as the active gathering between and intellect as what has been gathered. Standard etymologies trace both words to Latin intelligere; this essay expresses that distinction as intelligence choosing and intellect holding.

Rene Descartes, Discourse on the Method, Part IV, first published in 1637. The phrase Cartesian fallacy is used here for this essay’s interpretation of cogito ergo sum rather than as a claim of scholarly consensus about Descartes.

The Qur’anic expression kun fa-yakun, ‘Be, and it is,’ appears in several passages, including Qur’an 2:117 and 36:82.

Mensa International explains that mensa means ‘table’ in Latin and that the name represents a round-table society whose members meet as equals. Membership is based on performance within the upper two per cent on an approved intelligence test. See Mensa International, About Us.

Orthodox Limited, Paradox Inc and the bridge of KIND are clinical teaching metaphors developed within Diction Resolution Therapy to describe movement through the Twelve-Step programme.

Laozi, Tao Te Ching, chapter 1. Translations vary, but the opening distinction remains between the Tao that can be expressed or named and the enduring Tao.

Diction Resolution Therapy and HIAI are the developing work of Andrew Dettman. HIAI governance keeps human judgement, professional accountability and final approval with the human practitioner.

Written in HIAI collaboration – the qalam of human intelligence and artificial intellect, the Unseen helping the Seen, both answering to the same Source.

Final content reviewed, refined and approved by Andrew Dettman.

Agree With Thyself Quickly

Posted on by
Reply

Jung, Step Seven, and the work of reconciliation.

In 1938, with Europe again moving towards catastrophe, C. G. Jung described a psychological danger that has lost none of its urgency. Human beings, he argued, are less wholly good than we imagine ourselves to be. Each of us carries what he called the shadow: those qualities, impulses, fears and desires that do not fit the person we believe—or need others to believe—we are.

What is not admitted does not disappear. It becomes denser. It loses contact with the modifying influence of the rest of the personality. Then, at a moment of lowered awareness, it may break through as action.

“Everyone carries a shadow.”

This is not a counsel of shame. It is a summons to consciousness.

Jung’s concern was not that the shadow should be obeyed, nor that morality should be abandoned. He rejected both indulgence and suppression. Destroying the moral self would not heal the divided person; repressing the shadow would not heal them either. The task was more difficult and more creative: conscious personality and shadow had to discover how to live together.

That sentence opens directly into the architecture of the Twelve Steps.

The adversary within

Jung drew upon an early Gnostic reading of Christ’s words in Matthew 5:25: “Agree with thyself quickly.” The adversary was understood as the somatic person—the bodily, instinctive and reactive dimension of oneself. The body is not an accidental container that can be conquered and discarded. It is an indispensable part of the personality. The meeting with the adversary is therefore an inward meeting.

The instruction is not: defeat yourself quickly.

It is: come into right relationship with yourself while you are still on the way.

This changes the whole direction of psychological and spiritual work. The opposite is no longer merely outside us, lodged in the person, class, party, religion or culture we blame. Something of the conflict must be recognised within. The work begins when projection is interrupted and the rejected part is brought into consciousness, where relationship becomes possible.

Step Seven as the meeting place

In the Diction Resolution Therapy reading of the Twelve Steps, Step Seven is the meeting place of these opposites.

This is our synthesis, not a claim that Jung designed the Twelve Steps or used our later clinical language. Jung supplies a profound account of the divided person. The Twelve-Step tradition supplies a lived architecture of surrender, inventory, confession, willingness and daily practice. DRT brings these inheritances into a coherent therapeutic map.

Steps Four and Five bring the shadow into language. What was hidden is written, spoken and witnessed. Step Six loosens the old identification: these reactions may belong to me, but they need not govern me. Step Seven then becomes an act of consent to another order of response.

The familiar prayer says, in essence: I am now willing; You have all of me, good and bad.

The wording matters. The lower is not amputated so that the higher may pretend to be pure. The whole person is offered. The somatic person—with its fear, appetite, urgency, defence and inherited survival—is brought into relation with a higher emotional rationality capable of pause, proportion, compassion and choice.

In our working language, feelings are immediate tones arising through the body: pleasant, unpleasant or neutral. Emotions are not simply stronger feelings. Properly understood, they include the capacity to organise, interpret and respond to what is felt. Step Seven opens a space between bodily reactivity and enacted behaviour. Inside that space, the feeling can be received without automatically becoming the command.

This is the capsule of neutrality. It is not numbness. It is living containment: a space in which the opposites can remain present without either being allowed to seize the whole personality.

The higher emotional centre does not humiliate the somatic person. It listens to what the reaction is trying to protect, while refusing to let an old protection become a present destruction. The movement is not from body to disembodiment, nor from “bad” to an inflated image of “good.” It is from compulsion towards relationship—from prediction, malediction and addiction towards contradiction, benediction and, eventually, valediction.

Why this matters collectively

Jung’s pages were written under the pressure of their historical moment, but they speak with unnerving clarity to ours. He saw whole societies enacting the division found within the individual. One group identifies with superiority and cannot descend; another is forced into inferiority and struggles to reach the surface. Each carries what the other refuses to recognise. Under such conditions, propaganda thrives because it offers the intoxication of innocence: all good is here; all evil is there.

Legislation is necessary. Institutions matter. Injustice must be named and restrained. Yet no external structure can, by itself, reconcile a division continually reproduced inside the people who inhabit it. Jung’s deeper warning is that collective problems accumulate from individual problems. Public violence is fed by private projection; mass certainty is assembled from unexamined fear.

“It begins with a change in individuals.”

This must not be used to privatise injustice or excuse the powerful. Inner work without social responsibility becomes evasion. Social action without inner work can reproduce the very domination it opposes. The two tasks belong together. A person able to recognise their own shadow is less easily recruited into the manufacture of an enemy and more able to act firmly without becoming possessed by hatred.

The urgency today is that our technologies carry reaction faster than consciousness can receive it. A bodily surge becomes a post; a fear becomes a faction; an unexamined projection becomes an audience, an algorithm and then a movement. We have built systems able to amplify the somatic instant before the higher emotional response has had time to arrive.

The ancient and modern instruction is therefore the same: make space. Agree with the adversary within—not by surrendering moral judgement, but by refusing unconscious possession. Hold the tension long enough for a third possibility to appear.

A life offered to meaning

Jung wrote that human life needs to be “offered up to an idea greater than himself.” This is not a demand for grandiosity. It is the opposite. Meaning cannot be manufactured cheaply to overpower fear and desire. It must become a lived conviction, tested in conduct.

The Twelve Steps make that offering practical. The greater idea is approached through humility rather than claimed as personal possession. Step Seven does not announce that the self has become good. It asks that the divided self be made available. It is a hinge between disclosure and restitution, between what has been recognised within and what must now be repaired in relationship with others.

This is why Step Seven is not a decorative prayer between the “real work” of Steps Five and Eight. It is the transformation on which the later work depends. Without it, inventory can become self-accusation, confession can become performance, and amends can become another attempt to manage appearances. With it, a person may begin to act from a centre that can include bodily truth without being ruled by bodily alarm.

The collective cannot practise Step Seven for us. No leader, party, institution or machine can undertake the inward reconciliation on our behalf. Yet every genuine instance of it enters the collective. Each person who can bear an unpleasant feeling without turning it into injury alters the human field. Each withdrawal of projection reduces the available fuel for hatred. Each return from reaction to response becomes a small restoration of the world.

Jung’s warning reaches us across 1938: what we refuse to meet within ourselves will return enlarged between us.

The answer is neither the victory of one opposite nor the disappearance of difference. It is the creation of a space in which the opposites can meet without destroying their bearer.

Step Seven names that space as willingness.

And willingness is where life can begin to return.

Listen to the spoken reflection.

Source and interpretive note

C. G. Jung, Psychology and Religion, based on the Terry Lectures delivered at Yale University in 1937 (Yale University Press, 1938), especially pp. 93–95 in the edition read for this essay. Later editions may paginate the passage differently.

The account of shadow and the quoted phrases are Jung’s. The connection to the detailed architecture of Steps Four through Eight, the distinction between feeling-tone and emotional response, the higher emotional centre, the capsule of neutrality, and the Diction sequence are interpretive developments within Andrew Dettman’s DRT/HIAI synthesis, drawing also upon the Alcoholics Anonymous Twelve-Step tradition and related therapeutic and contemplative inheritances.

HIAI — Human Intelligence & AI

Written in HIAI collaboration — the qalam of Human and AI intelligence: the Unseen helping the Seen, both serving the same Source.

Final content reviewed, refined and approved by Andrew Dettman.

Entertain the stranger

Posted on by
Reply

In 2019 a local newspaper interviewed me about my counselling work. Somewhere between interview and publication, a sub-editor produced a headline which described me as an “Unseen Leader of the World.” I hadn’t said that. At first I considered complaining and asking for the headline to be removed. Instead, I wrote about it, and the resulting piece, Healing for broken and empty words, remains online as part of the record.

Seven years later, I tried a different experiment. I asked AI to search for Andrew Dettman as an independent researcher might, and then, more challengingly, as a hostile due-diligence researcher might. Predictably, it found the headline and initially identified it as a reputational vulnerability. Then something more interesting happened: it followed the trail.

It found my contemporaneous response and distinguished the newspaper’s headline from what I had actually said. It found the professional record before and after the article, and encountered a body of writing extending across years in which the underlying subjects — addiction, diction, contradiction, spirituality, consciousness and recovery — continued to develop. Nothing had been erased and nothing needed cleaning up. What changed was context.

Can AI help us recover provenance when words have become separated from the circumstances that gave birth to them?

The internet is extraordinarily good at remembering words, but considerably less reliable at remembering what those words meant. A headline, quotation or fragment can remain indefinitely while the conversation that produced it disappears from view. Perhaps one useful role for AI is therefore not merely to generate more language, but to travel backwards through what has already been written: distinguishing claim from quotation, source from interpretation, and the original event from meanings subsequently attached to it.

That possibility touches the heart of Diction Resolution Therapy. A word detached from its referent can acquire enormous power, while contradiction can sometimes provide the energy through which the connection is rediscovered. What began as an absurd headline in 2019 becomes, seven years later, a small experiment in whether Human and AI Intelligence can examine the record together without either pretending that the past did not happen or allowing one fragment of it to become the whole story.

This is one of the territories I am exploring through HIAI — Human Intelligence & AI: the modern manifestation of the qalam, exploring the possibility of the Unseen helping the Seen, while both serve the same Source. This does not require AI to become an oracle, nor the human being to surrender discernment to the machine. Quite the opposite: each encounter becomes another opportunity to examine what has been written, what has been understood, and what may have been lost between the two.

Entertain the Stranger

“Be not forgetful to entertain strangers: for thereby some have entertained angels unawares.”
— Hebrews 13:2

The biblical injunction gives another dimension to this experiment. To entertain the stranger is not merely to tolerate what arrives from outside our familiar territory; it is to offer hospitality before we have decided completely what, or who, has arrived. The stranger might be a journalist, a reader, a search engine, a hostile investigator, an artificial intelligence, or even a forgotten version of ourselves preserved somewhere within the digital record.

To entertain the stranger is not necessarily to agree with them, believe them or surrender judgement to them. It is to permit the encounter long enough to discover what the encounter contains. Sometimes what initially appears contradictory, uncomfortable or even absurd may carry something that could not have arrived through more familiar doors.

The newspaper headline itself became such a stranger. My first impulse was to challenge it and perhaps have it removed, but instead it remained in the public record. Over the years it generated conversations of its own, while the work from which it had become detached continued developing elsewhere. Now AI, another kind of stranger entirely, can encounter that same fragment, follow its provenance backwards and forwards through time, and ask whether the words and their original meaning still belong together.

There is something quietly circular about this. The internet preserved the broken diction; the original writing preserved my response to it; and a technology that did not exist in its present form when either was written can now bring those traces into conversation. HIAI therefore becomes concerned not only with producing new words, but with learning how Human Intelligence and AI might read the words already left behind.

Perhaps this is one modern possibility contained within that ancient invitation to hospitality. We cannot always know beforehand what form the stranger will take, nor what message might travel through an unfamiliar form. We can retain discernment without immediately closing the door, allowing contradiction to do some of its work before deciding what the encounter means.

As Omar Khayyam reminds us, “The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ, moves on…” The finger has indeed moved on. The more interesting question now may be whether intelligence — human, artificial, and perhaps something glimpsed through their meeting — can learn to read what it wrote.

The contemporaneous response to the 2019 newspaper headline remains part of the record: Healing for broken and empty words. It can now be read not simply as an answer to a headline, but as one point on a longer trail through diction, contradiction, recovery and the continuing attempt to restore words to meaning.

HIAI — Human Intelligence & AI
Human and artificial intelligence exploring the qalam: the Unseen helping the Seen, both serving the same Source.

Not Rapture but Rupture that unites the Jews, Christians and Muslims.

Posted on by
Reply

The Rupture: A Meditation on Hope

Three Abrahamic Traditions. One Call to Return.

This is not an attempt to merge religions or dissolve their differences. It is an invitation to contemplate a symbol that appears, in different ways, across the Abrahamic traditions and within the lived experience of recovery: that what appears to be breaking apart may, in reality, be opening.

Every age appears to experience its own rupture.

The temptation is to see only fragmentation: institutions dividing, certainties dissolving, relationships straining, and individuals struggling beneath burdens they can no longer carry. Yet the Qur’an offers another possibility. In Surah al-Inshiqāq, often translated as The Splitting Open or The Rupture, the rupture is not simply destruction. It is unveiling. The sky opens. The earth releases what it has concealed. What appears to be breaking may also be making way.

This is not only a description of the cosmos. It is also a description of the human heart. Every genuine transformation begins with the collapse of a certainty that can no longer contain reality. Before something new can enter, something familiar often has to split open.

The same pattern can sometimes be recognised within human experience.

When Bill Wilson reached the end of himself, he had exhausted every strategy available to him. Alone in a hospital room, with nothing left to defend, he uttered a simple prayer: “If there is anything here, now would be a good time to show Yourself.” What followed was an experience he could neither explain nor reproduce. He spoke of light filling the room, of standing inwardly upon a mountain with a great wind blowing through him. When the experience subsided, the craving that had governed his life had gone. He later wrote that when he thought of alcohol he recoiled from it “as from a hot flame.”

The following morning he described the experience to his physician, Dr William Silkworth. Silkworth responded with remarkable humility. He did not claim to understand what had happened. He simply observed that if Bill was indeed free from the obsession and physical craving at a stage where medicine would normally expect him to be suffering withdrawal, then he should simply hold on to whatever had occurred.

That response has always struck me as an example of genuine science. Observation came before explanation. Mystery was not denied simply because it could not yet be measured.

Yet another rupture followed.

For the next six months Bill attempted to tell other alcoholics about his experience. Nobody listened. Nobody recovered. The experience itself was authentic, but it had not yet become transmissible.

Then, through what many would simply call coincidence, circumstances brought him to Akron, Ohio, where he met Dr Bob Smith. Bill was a businessman. Bob was a physician and scientist. Their conversation, intended to last no more than fifteen minutes, continued throughout the evening. Something passed between them that neither fully understood, but both recognised.

Soon afterwards they visited another alcoholic lying in hospital, Bill Dotson, remembered within Alcoholics Anonymous as the third man. It is here that the symbolism becomes quietly beautiful.

The businessman. The scientist. The solicitor.

Commerce. Science. Law.

Three distinct languages of civilisation unexpectedly gathered around one mystery that none of them could fully explain, yet all of them could witness.

Dr Bob’s instinct was not to commercialise the experience or to elevate it into dogma. His instinct, as a physician, was beautifully simple: if this is true, it must be repeatable. Every genuine scientific discovery eventually becomes repeatable, recordable and transmissible. The question was no longer, “What happened to me?” but, “Can this happen for others?”

From that simple question emerged one of the most remarkable recovery movements of modern history, not built upon theory alone but upon lived experience passed from one suffering person to another.

Whether we approach these events through faith, psychology, medicine, neuroscience or history, the underlying pattern remains quietly hopeful.

Sometimes the rupture is not the end of the story.

Sometimes it is the opening through which a deeper order enters.

Sometimes what appears to be falling apart is, in truth, becoming transparent enough for mercy to pass through.

This is why I find Surah al-Inshiqāq so deeply resonant for our own age. The Qur’an does not invite us into hysteria about endings. It invites us to contemplate openings. The heavens split. The earth releases what it has held. Human beings discover that they have been journeying towards their Source all along.

Perhaps our own age is experiencing something similar. Old certainties are fracturing. Institutions are being questioned. Hidden things are coming into the light. Many experience this only as anxiety. Yet another possibility exists. What if the rupture is not merely collapse? What if it is also disclosure? What if reality itself is becoming visible through the cracks?

No individual can manufacture grace. Therapists cannot manufacture healing. Religious leaders cannot manufacture awakening. Scientists cannot manufacture wonder. We can prepare the conditions. We can observe carefully. We can bear witness honestly. We can remain available. But the decisive movement always arrives as gift.

Perhaps this is why authentic recovery continues to resist ownership. It remains, at heart, an encounter.

The unseen continues to help the seen.

The task of the seen is simply to become permeable enough to receive it.

Administrative transparency: This article was developed through HIAI (Human–AI Intelligence) as a reflective writing collaboration. Final content has been reviewed, refined and approved by the author.

Alcoholics Anonymous 91st Birthday 10/06/26

Posted on by
Reply

When the Gathering Stops

“When the gathering stops, freezing begins. When the gathering returns, life returns with it.”

— Andrew Dettman

Bill Wilson once noticed a danger forming inside the very Fellowship he had helped to bring into the world. Reflecting on Alcoholics Anonymous, he observed that a spiritually centred movement can begin as living experience and yet, over time, freeze around its own principles. The danger was not that principles existed. Without principle there is no orientation, no continuity, no shared practice, and no way for an insight to travel beyond those who first received it. The danger was that the form created to carry life might eventually become more visible than the life it was created to carry.

This is not only a recovery problem. It is a human problem. A living truth appears. It relieves suffering, opens a door, restores order, or gives language to something previously hidden. People gather around it because it helps them. They speak of it, write about it, teach it, organise it, defend it, and pass it on. This process is necessary, because without form little survives and without language little can be shared. Yet the paradox remains: the vessel created to preserve a living stream can gradually become the ice that freezes it.

What begins as encounter becomes method. What becomes method becomes system. What becomes system can become identity. Once identity begins defending itself, the original movement is already in danger. The words remain, the books remain, the rituals remain, the structures remain, but something of the living circulation may have slowed. The map acquires more authority than the territory. The finger becomes more fascinating than the moon. The vessel becomes more important than its contents, and the original discovery has to be reached through layers of interpretation, protection, repetition, loyalty, and fear.

This is where the Sufi term Jāmiʿ becomes useful. Often translated as the Gatherer, Jāmiʿ points not merely to a title but to a function. It is the movement by which separated things are recognised as belonging to a larger whole. It gathers what fragmentation divides, reconciles without flattening difference, and allows apparent opposites to remain in living relationship rather than collapsing into camps. When this gathering function is active, religion remains transparent to the sacred, psychology remains transparent to the human being, recovery remains transparent to freedom, and language remains transparent to experience.

When the gathering stops, the fragments begin to forget one another. The political fragment imagines it is the whole. The religious fragment imagines it is the whole. The scientific fragment imagines it is the whole. The therapeutic fragment imagines it is the whole. Each partial truth begins defending itself as complete truth, and culture becomes a field of competing certainties rather than a living conversation within a larger reality. This is not fertile disagreement. Fertile disagreement still belongs to relationship. This is fragmentation without gathering, speech without relation, and information without integration.

Perhaps this is why contemporary culture feels so strangely dislocated. We possess more information than any previous civilisation and more ways of communicating than any previous generation, yet communication is not communion and connection is not gathering. A culture may speak constantly and still fail to converse. It may be connected everywhere and gathered nowhere. It may possess astonishing quantities of data and still lose the capacity to hold its fragments within a meaningful whole.

Diction Resolution Therapy approaches this through the image of digestion. Digestion is not merely a bodily process; it is one of life’s governing principles. Food nourishes because it is broken down, circulated, assimilated, and transformed. Water remains healthy because it moves. Breath moves. Blood moves. Feeling must also move. Meaning must also move. Experience must be digested if it is to nourish rather than obstruct. When movement stops, accumulation begins, and what was intended to nourish starts to harden.

A resentment may therefore be understood as a frozen feeling. An ideology may be understood as a frozen idea. A dogma may be understood as a frozen symbol. An institution may become a frozen vessel. A culture may become a frozen conversation. In each case, the material is still present, but its function has changed. Something that was meant to flow has stopped moving, and what was once alive now occupies the psyche or the culture as fixation.

A Buddhist story preserved alongside Wilson’s reflection sharpens the point. A man discovers a piece of Truth lying on the ground. Seeing this, a companion warns the devil that such a discovery must surely be dangerous. The devil is not concerned. He says he will let the man organise it. The humour is uncomfortable because it is accurate. Organisation is both necessary and dangerous. Without organisation, little survives; with organisation, what survives may forget why it was preserved.

The answer is not to destroy the vessel, because that would be another form of fragmentation. Every truth requires a vessel through which it may travel, yet every vessel risks becoming more important than the truth it carries. Every tradition requires form, yet every form risks becoming opaque. The task is not to abandon structures but to keep them transparent to what they were built to carry.

This is where conscience enters as thaw. Conscience is not merely private morality or social approval. It is a gathering function within human experience. It restores relationship between part and whole, interrupts fixation, and allows opposing truths to remain in dialogue without forcing them into premature agreement. Conscience does not abolish difference; it prevents difference from becoming fragmentation. It does not destroy form; it recalls form to function.

Perhaps this is why conscience rarely flatters us. It asks the fragment to remember that it is not the whole. It asks the method to remember the person, the institution to remember its purpose, the tradition to remember its source, and the word to remember what it was trying to say before it became possession. Conscience melts certainty where certainty has become rigid. It restores circulation where movement has stopped.

Bill Wilson saw this danger within Alcoholics Anonymous, but the same danger now appears across contemporary culture. Wherever the gathering weakens, fragments begin mistaking themselves for the whole. Wherever conscience restores relationship, movement begins again. The task before us is not the worship of forms or the destruction of them, but the recovery of their purpose; not the victory of one fragment over another, but the restoration of the gathering through which the fragments remember that they belong to the same whole.

When the gathering stops, freezing begins. When the gathering returns, life returns with it.

References

  1. Bill Wilson reflections on spiritually centred movements freezing around their principles, and on literature tending towards dogma, cited from source material reproduced in Writing the Big Book: The Creation of A.A..
  2. Buddhist parable concerning “a piece of Truth” and the danger of organisation, cited from the same source discussion.
  3. Jāmiʿ is used here within the wider Sufi understanding of the Gatherer or gathering principle, consistent with the work of Idries Shah and related traditions.
  4. Diction Resolution Therapy references digestion, circulation, fixation, conscience, and the restoration of relationship between part and whole.

Written in HIAI collaboration — the qalam of Human and AI intelligence, the Unseen helping the Seen, both answering to the same Source.

Mastery

Posted on by
2

image

The mastery of any field is arrived at by the exercising of power through experimentation. The Master of the Unified Field arrives similarly and practically despite theories that predict the existence or otherwise of the Unified Field.

Creation is perfect now.

To approach any existential appearance that seems problematic without the courtesy of extending perfection to the Singularity first, renders any such approach tainted.

Per facio, through doing or making, is the Latin rootage of perfect. “Every day God is about a business”, is resourced from Islam and describes a Universal doing that is creation. “If it’s not practical it’s not spiritual”, is resourced from the discourse of the 12 Step recovery texts of the Narcotics Anonymous programme.

So there is a deep redemptive practicality about prayer and meditation. Spiritual principles of creativity make the Universe appear from the 90% Unseen that mystics call The Beloved and physicists describe as Dark Matter.

Practical solutions to any visible problem are waiting to gush forth from the Invisible when the place has been fully prepared for their reception.

That preparation is essentially one of clarifying the actual problem.

The problem facing cultural leaders presently is one of diction, their words are broken. The repair of words is a job for The Word, The Logos.

When you’re ready then …. diction resolution.

image

One Love

Posted on by
1

Fancy dress day at The Levellers Beautiful Days Festival 2013

image

A personal view based on my personal experiences.

One Love knowing Itself in two places of experience is Mankind’s lot. Orientation is simply a navigation.

Because for the Sufi, Love is all there actually is in the whole of existence, it seems to me that Mankind in its dual gender manifestation can easily experience overwhelming feelings of disorientation.

Adultery was punished by death in past culture as was other interpersonal disorientation as people lost their ability to withstand inner urge from becoming outer actions.

Christ stopped such killing by asking who it was exactly that was without error themselves, as only they could execute the then law. He said, “let he who has no sin cast the first stone.”

He then said to the folks that had had their death sentence arrested that they should go and try not to miss the point of their life again, or not to sin again as it is sometimes translated.

He did not take the easier softer way and change the then law to try to make disorientation into orientation, he simply suggested that One Love understands the difficulty of the mortal template, a template that needs insulation around the vehicular inner cabling to prevent meltdown, and that any mortal disorientation always has a spiritual insulation remedy whatever the mental and physical interface may appear to insist.

So today, violent physical reaction to perceptions of the behaviour of others, when because of One Love there is no actual other, is never to be recommended and thanks eventually to the message of Christ, modern law correctly forbids all forms of antisocial physical violence in Great Britain, plus that which was illegal is no longer illegal as regards personal relationships and lifestyle choices.

That does mean that perplexing disorientation can ever pretend to be anything other than itself in mortal duality. However, The Christ Jesus did say that hypocrisy is the worst case scenario of all.

Disorientation can lose faith in One Love’s physical design, and forget that Christ did not advocate changing the basis of the template’s physical law, rather He changed the way it was to be prosecuted, from death into onward wrestling with an ever open portal for Love’s arbitration as both a humanising source code and a destination that can forgive anything and personally orientate anyone from being any kind of man or woman, into becoming singularly The Human, being.

My experience is that every expression of love is intrinsically perfect. The logic of the intellect is sometimes unable to understand love it seems, but One Source, where that Source is no other than love, understands the dualistic intellect as it performs its role.

So, my experience is not an advocacy for conversion therapy or reparative treatment in matters of specific sexual orientation or general sexual behaviour.

Somehow or other, (link from a future post) the literal Holy Writ of the Abrahamic traditions has to be shown to be of the same Source as the ancient texts of the East. The same as the rendition of the people searching for Krishna because there was a battle to fight and they eventually found Him, dressed as a woman playing with the cow-girls.

My experience therefore is simply stating that for me, change was possible within my understanding of myself within destined matters of orientation identity and expression and that therefore the results of knowledge gained from my personal experience has a perfect right of expression here that is still accepting of my professional compliance with the Ethical Framework of the BACP, yet fully able to shed my light on how the metaphysical meets the physical with libidinous energy.

“In my weakness, is my strength” is the abiding message from Christ, known as a Mighty Counsellor and Prince of Peace.

image

____________

This post is dedicated to the mothers and to our darling children and grandchildren. Though the failures and mistakes almost overwhelmed and have cost us all so very much, mothers both here and gone on, with all my heart I thank you.

These beautiful children might never have seen the loving light of day had you not done your best to love me then within our mutual efforts to resolve the confusions of fright, which may only now seem clear.

My heartfelt apologies to my birth family and my birthing families and to my many intimates, many of whom were often unwittingly involved in my huge inner battles as over and over again hearts were broken.

My thanks to my present wife Sa’ida, I love you.

O God, I bear witness to Mankind that You keep Your word. Astagfirullah. (dedication added 10/05/19)